Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
Independent ranking

Best Yield Aggregators

Yield aggregators scored on linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded value locked.

Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last checked August 10, 2026
1B

Beefy

Best for audited protocol with published methodology
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%10.0
Cost transparency · 15%9.0
Market quality · 15%7.0
Transparency & track record · 20%10.0
Public documentation surface · 10%10.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
  • TVL of $103m recorded independently
Cons
  • Several indicators could not be verified from public sources at this check
9.4/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
2F

Fusion by IPOR

Best for audited protocol with published methodology
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%10.0
Cost transparency · 15%9.0
Market quality · 15%6.0
Transparency & track record · 20%10.0
Public documentation surface · 10%10.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • Several indicators could not be verified from public sources at this check
9.3/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
3S

Superform

Best for audited protocol with published methodology
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%10.0
Cost transparency · 15%9.0
Market quality · 15%6.0
Transparency & track record · 20%10.0
Public documentation surface · 10%10.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • Several indicators could not be verified from public sources at this check
9.3/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
4L

Lulo

Best for audited protocol with published methodology
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%10.0
Cost transparency · 15%9.0
Market quality · 15%4.0
Transparency & track record · 20%10.0
Public documentation surface · 10%10.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • Single-chain deployment
9.0/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
5D

DeFindex

Best for audited protocol with published methodology
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%10.0
Cost transparency · 15%9.0
Market quality · 15%3.0
Transparency & track record · 20%10.0
Public documentation surface · 10%10.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • Single-chain deployment
8.8/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
6Y

YO Protocol

Best for audited protocol with published methodology
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%9.0
Cost transparency · 15%6.0
Market quality · 15%6.0
Transparency & track record · 20%10.0
Public documentation surface · 10%9.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • Several indicators could not be verified from public sources at this check
8.3/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7Y

Yearn Finance

Best for independently tracked protocol
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%8.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 15%7.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • TVL of $178m recorded independently
Cons
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
7.7/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
8v

vfat.io

Best for independently tracked protocol
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%8.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 15%6.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
Cons
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
7.6/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
9V

Vesper

Best for independently tracked protocol
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%8.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 15%5.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
Cons
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
7.4/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
10M

Meteora vaults

Best for independently tracked protocol
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%8.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 15%4.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
Cons
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
7.2/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
11A

AlphaFi Agg

Best for independently tracked protocol
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%8.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 15%4.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
Cons
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
7.2/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
12H

Hyperbeat Earn

Best for independently tracked protocol
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%6.0
Cost transparency · 15%9.0
Market quality · 15%4.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
6.7/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
13C

CIAN Yield Layer

Best for independently tracked protocol
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%4.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 15%8.0
Transparency & track record · 20%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%6.0
Pros
  • TVL of $268m recorded independently
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
5.7/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
14F

Fluid Lite

Best for independently tracked protocol
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%4.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 15%5.0
Transparency & track record · 20%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%6.0
Pros
  • TVL of $145m recorded independently
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
5.2/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
15K

Kinetiq Earn

Best for independently tracked protocol
Counterparty & contract risk · 40%4.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 15%3.0
Transparency & track record · 20%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%6.0
Pros
  • Tracked and verifiable from public sources at this check
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
4.9/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
At a glance

Compare the field

ServiceScoreStrongest areaBest for
Beefy9.4Counterparty & contract risk (10.0)audited protocol with published methodology
Fusion by IPOR9.3Counterparty & contract risk (10.0)audited protocol with published methodology
Superform9.3Counterparty & contract risk (10.0)audited protocol with published methodology
Lulo9.0Counterparty & contract risk (10.0)audited protocol with published methodology
DeFindex8.8Counterparty & contract risk (10.0)audited protocol with published methodology
YO Protocol8.3Transparency & track record (10.0)audited protocol with published methodology
Yearn Finance7.7Counterparty & contract risk (8.0)independently tracked protocol
vfat.io7.6Counterparty & contract risk (8.0)independently tracked protocol
Vesper7.4Counterparty & contract risk (8.0)independently tracked protocol
Meteora vaults7.2Counterparty & contract risk (8.0)independently tracked protocol
AlphaFi Agg7.2Counterparty & contract risk (8.0)independently tracked protocol
Hyperbeat Earn6.7Cost transparency (9.0)independently tracked protocol
CIAN Yield Layer5.7Market quality (8.0)independently tracked protocol
Fluid Lite5.2Cost transparency (7.0)independently tracked protocol
Kinetiq Earn4.9Cost transparency (7.0)independently tracked protocol