Meteora vaults
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- Audit report linked from a public dataset
- No accounting methodology published at this check
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetIndependent audit report linked publicly
Audit report linked from the public protocol dataset.
drive.google.com/file/d/1CjdMl7LhJisnI1LTrAFt2Bvi5ahqq1yc/view - Met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/meteora-vaults - Not metAccounting methodology published in the dataset
No methodology published at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/meteora-vaults - MetApplication reachable at a public address
Reachable without an account at this check.
app.meteora.ag/vaults
- MetApplication reachable without an account
Reachable without an account at this check.
app.meteora.ag/vaults - MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/meteora-vaults - Not met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
app.meteora.ag/vaults - MetNo account required to reach the application
Reachable without an account at this check.
app.meteora.ag/vaults
- MetTotal value locked published independently
TVL $41m at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/meteora-vaults - Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- MetListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/meteora-vaults
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/meteora-vaults - MetAudit documentation linked
Linked publicly.
drive.google.com/file/d/1CjdMl7LhJisnI1LTrAFt2Bvi5ahqq1yc/view - MetChains and category disclosed
Category Yield Aggregator, 1 chain(s).
defillama.com/protocol/meteora-vaults - Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
Solana yield vaults holding $41m with published audits, dynamically reallocating deposits between lending venues as rates change.
Our assessment
Meteora's vaults hold $41m on Solana with two audits and reports linked, dynamically reallocating deposits across lending venues as rates change. They also supply liquidity to Meteora's own trading products, which is worth understanding.
Vaults that serve the wider protocol
Where a vault provides liquidity to the same operator's trading venues, the deposit is doing two jobs: earning lending yield and supporting the protocol's markets. That alignment is efficient and it means vault performance is connected to the trading business rather than being independent of it.
Rate optimisation on a cheap chain
Solana's transaction costs make frequent reallocation viable, so a vault can respond to rate changes continuously rather than in large infrequent steps. The gain is real; the exposure is to whichever venue currently holds the capital, and Solana lending markets vary widely in published evidence.
Evidence position
Two audits with linked reports, which is better than most Solana protocols in this comparison manage. The transparency and documentation indicators hold the score in the sevens, particularly around current allocation disclosure.
Who it suits
Meteora Vaults fit Solana users who want automated lending allocation from an established protocol on that chain. Users wanting a single documented counterparty should deposit into Kamino directly.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Meteora vaults is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.