Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
V
Yield Aggregators

Vesper

Best for independently tracked protocol

Total value locked:$60m at this checkChains:5Audits recorded:2Audit report linked:YesRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7.4
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 40%8.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 15%5.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
Cons
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 40% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Cost transparency · 15% weight7/10 points · 7.0/10
  • Met
    Application reachable without an account

    Reachable without an account at this check.

    vesper.finance/
  • Met
    Protocol economics published independently

    TVL and change history published.

    defillama.com/protocol/vesper
  • Not met
    Accounting methodology published

    Not published at this check.

    defillama.com/protocol/vesper
  • Partial
    Fee or reward model documented publicly

    Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.

    vesper.finance/
  • Met
    No account required to reach the application

    Reachable without an account at this check.

    vesper.finance/
Market quality · 15% weight5/10 points · 5.0/10
Transparency & track record · 20% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

A yield protocol holding $60m across five chains, offering deliberately simple set-and-forget pools with published audit reports.

Our assessment

Vesper holds $60m across five chains with two audits and reports linked. Its design philosophy is deliberate simplicity: deposit an asset into a pool, receive yield, do nothing else.

Simplicity has a real audience

Most DeFi yield products assume a user who will monitor positions, rebalance ranges and evaluate strategies. Most people will not. A product that works without attention will beat a theoretically superior one that is abandoned after three weeks — and that gap is where most retail DeFi returns actually go.

Simple does not mean safe

A single-asset pool still deploys capital into underlying protocols, and those protocols can fail. The simplicity is in the user interface, not in the risk. Read where the yield comes from: a pool earning from established lending markets and one farming a new protocol's emissions present very differently and look identical on the deposit screen.

Evidence position

Two audits with linked reports and multi-chain deployment. The transparency and documentation indicators are what hold this in the sevens — current strategy documentation and incident history at stable public addresses would move it up.

Who it suits

Vesper fits long-horizon depositors who want yield without ongoing management and will check the underlying strategies once. Users wanting to optimise actively should use Beefy, Fusion or vfat.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
Beefy9.4audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Superform9.3audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Fusion by IPOR9.3audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Vesper is safe?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.

Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?

A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.