Vesper
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- Audit report linked from a public dataset
- No accounting methodology published at this check
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetIndependent audit report linked publicly
Audit report linked from the public protocol dataset.
github.com/vesperfi/doc/tree/main/audit - Met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/vesper - Not metAccounting methodology published in the dataset
No methodology published at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/vesper - Met
- Met
- MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/vesper - Not met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
vesper.finance/ - MetNo account required to reach the application
Reachable without an account at this check.
vesper.finance/
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Met
- PartialListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/vesper
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
A yield protocol holding $60m across five chains, offering deliberately simple set-and-forget pools with published audit reports.
Our assessment
Vesper holds $60m across five chains with two audits and reports linked. Its design philosophy is deliberate simplicity: deposit an asset into a pool, receive yield, do nothing else.
Simplicity has a real audience
Most DeFi yield products assume a user who will monitor positions, rebalance ranges and evaluate strategies. Most people will not. A product that works without attention will beat a theoretically superior one that is abandoned after three weeks — and that gap is where most retail DeFi returns actually go.
Simple does not mean safe
A single-asset pool still deploys capital into underlying protocols, and those protocols can fail. The simplicity is in the user interface, not in the risk. Read where the yield comes from: a pool earning from established lending markets and one farming a new protocol's emissions present very differently and look identical on the deposit screen.
Evidence position
Two audits with linked reports and multi-chain deployment. The transparency and documentation indicators are what hold this in the sevens — current strategy documentation and incident history at stable public addresses would move it up.
Who it suits
Vesper fits long-horizon depositors who want yield without ongoing management and will check the underlying strategies once. Users wanting to optimise actively should use Beefy, Fusion or vfat.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Vesper is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.