AlphaFi Agg
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- Audit report linked from a public dataset
- No accounting methodology published at this check
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetIndependent audit report linked publicly
Audit report linked from the public protocol dataset.
github.com/AlphaFiTech/Audit/blob/main/AlphaFi_Smart_Contract_Preliminar - Met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/alphafi-agg - Not metAccounting methodology published in the dataset
No methodology published at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/alphafi-agg - Met
- Met
- MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/alphafi-agg - Not met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
alphafi.xyz - Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- MetListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/alphafi-agg
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/alphafi-agg - MetAudit documentation linked
Linked publicly.
github.com/AlphaFiTech/Audit/blob/main/AlphaFi_Smart_Contract_Preliminar - MetChains and category disclosed
Category Yield Aggregator, 1 chain(s).
defillama.com/protocol/alphafi-agg - Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- MetAudit links reachable
Linked publicly.
github.com/AlphaFiTech/Audit/blob/main/AlphaFi_Smart_Contract_Preliminar - Not met
- Met
An automated yield vault protocol holding $18m with published audits, operating in a newer ecosystem with limited DeFi alternatives.
Our assessment
AlphaFi holds $18m with two audits and reports linked, offering automated yield vaults in a newer ecosystem where the set of available strategies is much narrower than on established chains.
Newer ecosystems have thinner track records
The protocols an aggregator deploys into determine its risk, and on a young chain those protocols have short histories, less adversarial testing and often no published audits of their own. An aggregator can be well built and still be allocating into venues that are not — which is why counterparty risk carries 40% of the weight here.
Incentivised yields need decomposing
Newer ecosystems typically subsidise yield with token emissions to attract capital. That yield is real while it lasts and it is not a return on the underlying activity. Separate the base rate from the incentive before judging whether a figure is attractive, because only one of the two persists.
Evidence position
Two audits with linked reports is a strong signal for a protocol on a younger chain, where published review is less common. The transparency and documentation indicators are what hold the score in the sevens.
Who it suits
AlphaFi fits users already active in its ecosystem who want automated yield with published audits, sized for a young chain. Users on established chains have deeper, better-documented options.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score mean AlphaFi Agg is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.