Kinetiq Earn
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- Tracked and verifiable from public sources at this check
- No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
- No accounting methodology published at this check
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- Not metIndependent audit report linked publicly
No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/kinetiq-earn - Not met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/kinetiq-earn - Not metAccounting methodology published in the dataset
No methodology published at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/kinetiq-earn - MetApplication reachable at a public address
Reachable without an account at this check.
kinetiq.xyz/stake-hype#kinetiq-earn
- MetApplication reachable without an account
Reachable without an account at this check.
kinetiq.xyz/stake-hype#kinetiq-earn - MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/kinetiq-earn - Not met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
kinetiq.xyz/stake-hype#kinetiq-earn - MetNo account required to reach the application
Reachable without an account at this check.
kinetiq.xyz/stake-hype#kinetiq-earn
- MetTotal value locked published independently
TVL $39m at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/kinetiq-earn - Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- PartialListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/kinetiq-earn
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/kinetiq-earn - Not met
- MetChains and category disclosed
Category Yield Aggregator, 1 chain(s).
defillama.com/protocol/kinetiq-earn - Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Met
A yield product holding $39m on a purpose-built trading chain, with the thinnest published evidence base in this category.
Our assessment
Kinetiq Earn holds $39m and scores lowest of the fifteen yield aggregators in this comparison. No audit report was retrievable at a public address, and the transparency and documentation indicators returned little.
Yield products are the easiest place to lose money quietly
A lending position or a staking derivative has a mechanism a user can reason about. A yield product presents a number, and the mechanism producing it is whatever the strategy does. Where that strategy is undocumented and the contracts unreviewed, a depositor is accepting a number with no way to evaluate what generates it.
Concentration on a single ecosystem
Operating on one purpose-built chain means the strategies, the underlying protocols and the collateral all correlate with that ecosystem's activity. Diversification within it is nominal — in a stress event, everything moves together.
What the score records
An absence of published evidence rather than observed misconduct. Counterparty risk carries 40% of the weight in this category, and there is nothing published to score against it.
Who it suits
On published evidence, readers should prefer the audited aggregators in this table — Beefy, Fusion, Superform, Lulo or Yearn. Kinetiq Earn suits users already committed to its ecosystem who have reviewed the strategies themselves.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Kinetiq Earn is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.