vfat.io
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- Audit report linked from a public dataset
- No accounting methodology published at this check
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetIndependent audit report linked publicly
Audit report linked from the public protocol dataset.
reports.yaudit.dev/reports/06-2023-Sickle/ - Met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/vfat.io - Not metAccounting methodology published in the dataset
No methodology published at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/vfat.io - Met
- Met
- MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/vfat.io - Not met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
vfat.io/yield - MetNo account required to reach the application
Reachable without an account at this check.
vfat.io/yield
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Met
- MetListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/vfat.io
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/vfat.io - Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
A position management tool across 18 chains, holding $24m and focused on concentrated liquidity rather than passive yield vaults.
Our assessment
vfat holds $24m across 18 chains with two audits and reports linked. It is a position manager rather than a passive vault: its purpose is running concentrated liquidity positions, which require active decisions that ordinary aggregators do not make.
Concentrated liquidity needs management
A concentrated position earns fees only while the price sits inside its range, and stops earning entirely when it moves outside. Managing that means rebalancing — realising divergence loss each time in exchange for resuming fee income. Whether the trade is worth it depends on volatility and fee rates, and it is a judgement, not an algorithm.
Tools rather than decisions
A manager that automates rebalancing does not remove the underlying economics: a volatile pair can rebalance repeatedly into losses while showing high fee income. Users should understand net position value rather than accumulated fees, which is the number these interfaces tend to emphasise.
Evidence position
Two audits with linked reports across a wide multi-chain deployment. Coverage of 18 chains means many underlying venues, each with its own risk, and vfat's audits cover its own contracts rather than the pools it manages positions in.
Who it suits
vfat fits liquidity providers running concentrated positions who want tooling for rebalancing and understand divergence loss. Passive depositors should use Beefy, Yearn or a stable-pair vault.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score mean vfat.io is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.