Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
v
Yield Aggregators

vfat.io

Best for independently tracked protocol

Total value locked:$24m at this checkChains:18Audits recorded:2Audit report linked:YesRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7.6
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 40%8.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 15%6.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
Cons
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 40% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Cost transparency · 15% weight7/10 points · 7.0/10
  • Met
    Application reachable without an account

    Reachable without an account at this check.

    vfat.io/yield
  • Met
    Protocol economics published independently

    TVL and change history published.

    defillama.com/protocol/vfat.io
  • Not met
    Accounting methodology published

    Not published at this check.

    defillama.com/protocol/vfat.io
  • Partial
    Fee or reward model documented publicly

    Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.

    vfat.io/yield
  • Met
    No account required to reach the application

    Reachable without an account at this check.

    vfat.io/yield
Market quality · 15% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Transparency & track record · 20% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

A position management tool across 18 chains, holding $24m and focused on concentrated liquidity rather than passive yield vaults.

Our assessment

vfat holds $24m across 18 chains with two audits and reports linked. It is a position manager rather than a passive vault: its purpose is running concentrated liquidity positions, which require active decisions that ordinary aggregators do not make.

Concentrated liquidity needs management

A concentrated position earns fees only while the price sits inside its range, and stops earning entirely when it moves outside. Managing that means rebalancing — realising divergence loss each time in exchange for resuming fee income. Whether the trade is worth it depends on volatility and fee rates, and it is a judgement, not an algorithm.

Tools rather than decisions

A manager that automates rebalancing does not remove the underlying economics: a volatile pair can rebalance repeatedly into losses while showing high fee income. Users should understand net position value rather than accumulated fees, which is the number these interfaces tend to emphasise.

Evidence position

Two audits with linked reports across a wide multi-chain deployment. Coverage of 18 chains means many underlying venues, each with its own risk, and vfat's audits cover its own contracts rather than the pools it manages positions in.

Who it suits

vfat fits liquidity providers running concentrated positions who want tooling for rebalancing and understand divergence loss. Passive depositors should use Beefy, Yearn or a stable-pair vault.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
Beefy9.4audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Superform9.3audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Fusion by IPOR9.3audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean vfat.io is safe?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.

Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?

A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.