Fluid Lite
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- TVL of $145m recorded independently
- No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
- No accounting methodology published at this check
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- Not metIndependent audit report linked publicly
No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/fluid-lite - Not met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/fluid-lite - Not metAccounting methodology published in the dataset
No methodology published at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/fluid-lite - Met
- Met
- MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/fluid-lite - Not met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
www.fluid.io/ - MetNo account required to reach the application
Reachable without an account at this check.
www.fluid.io/
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- PartialListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/fluid-lite
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/fluid-lite - Not met
- MetChains and category disclosed
Category Yield Aggregator, 1 chain(s).
defillama.com/protocol/fluid-lite - Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Met
A simplified yield product holding $145m, offering easier access to an underlying protocol with no audit report retrievable publicly.
Our assessment
Fluid Lite holds $145m as a simplified entry point to a more complex underlying system. No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check, which is what holds the score at 5.2.
Simplified wrappers hide the mechanism
A product designed to make something complex accessible necessarily conceals what makes it complex. That is the point, and it means depositors arrive without understanding the mechanism they are exposed to. When something goes wrong, the people least equipped to interpret it are the ones the simplification attracted.
The wrapper is an extra contract
A simplified product is an additional contract layer between the depositor and the underlying protocol. Even where the underlying is well audited, the wrapper may not be — and a bug in the wrapper affects everyone in it regardless of how sound the layer beneath is.
What is missing
No audit report at a public address and thin transparency indicators. With $145m deposited, this is one of the larger gaps between capital held and evidence published anywhere in our comparison.
Who it suits
Fluid Lite fits users who understand the underlying system and want simplified access, accepting unaudited wrapper contracts. Users who want published review should use the audited aggregators in this table.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Fluid Lite is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.