Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
H
Yield Aggregators

Hyperbeat Earn

Best for independently tracked protocol

Total value locked:$24m at this checkChains:1Audits recorded:0Audit report linked:Not foundRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
6.7
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 40%6.0
Cost transparency · 15%9.0
Market quality · 15%4.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 40% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Cost transparency · 15% weight9/10 points · 9.0/10
Market quality · 15% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
Transparency & track record · 20% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

A yield vault protocol holding $24m on a high-performance trading chain, with no audit report retrievable at a public address at this check.

Our assessment

Hyperbeat Earn holds $24m in yield vaults on a chain built for high-performance trading. No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check.

Where the yield comes from matters here

On a chain dominated by leveraged trading, yield ultimately derives from traders paying to borrow and from market-making returns. That is a real source of income and it is correlated with trading activity. When volumes fall or a deleveraging event occurs, the yield and the underlying collateral values move together.

Vault yield is not a savings rate

A vault on a trading chain is underwriting trading activity, whatever the interface calls it. Depositors should read the strategy to understand what position they are taking — in several cases across this comparison, vault deposits are short-volatility positions presented as yield products.

The evidence gap

No audit report at a public address, with thin transparency results. Counterparty risk carries 40% of the score in this category — the highest weight we apply anywhere — because an aggregator concentrates the risk of everything it touches.

Who it suits

Hyperbeat Earn fits users active on its chain who understand the source of the yield and accept unaudited contracts. Users wanting audited vaults should use Beefy, Fusion, Superform or Lulo.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
Beefy9.4audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Superform9.3audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Fusion by IPOR9.3audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Hyperbeat Earn is safe?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.

Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?

A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.