Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
Independent crypto research

Evidence you can check, before you commit money.

Independent ratings of crypto exchanges, wallets and DeFi protocols, scored against a published rubric — alongside live market data and daily coverage from a named desk.

Independent ratings

Rated against a published rubric

Every provider is scored on evidence a reader can check: linked audits, published fee schedules, regulator registers and reserve attestations. The full indicator table sits on each review.

Dispatches

From the newsroom

Movers · 24h

Biggest moves in the top 100

Learn

From the almanac

Explore

Find your way around

Crypto Almanac Daily is a research desk covering the services people use to hold and trade digital assets. We rate providers against a published rubric, maintain reference pages for major assets, and report daily on the markets that move them. Everything is written for people who read before they act.

How our ratings differ from a top-ten list

Most rankings are opinions with numbers attached. Ours are computed: each provider is assessed against a fixed set of indicators, every indicator is recorded as met, partially met or failed with a source and a check date, and the score follows arithmetically from those records. The full evidence table sits on every review, so you can recompute the figure yourself or disagree with one specific indicator rather than with a verdict. The complete rubric — pillars, weights, gates and confidence grades — is published in full.

That has an uncomfortable consequence we publish rather than hide: a well-run company that documents itself poorly scores below a weaker one that publishes thoroughly. Where that happens, the review says so in plain terms instead of letting the number imply something it does not support.

What we score, and what we refuse to

We score what can be verified from public sources — regulator registers, audit reports, published fee schedules, reserve attestations, contract addresses. We do not score anything requiring an account, a private disclosure or our own unpublished measurements, because a figure nobody can check is not evidence. We also exclude country availability: a provider is not a worse counterparty because one regulator changed its mind, though we say so in the review when access is materially restricted.

Ratings age, so we date them

A score is a claim about a particular day, and every review carries the date it was verified. Inside 90 days a rating has normal standing. Past that it is flagged for re-check and loses eligibility for our editor's picks. Past a year it is withdrawn until someone verifies it again. Fees change, licences lapse and contracts are upgraded, and a rating that does not acknowledge that is decoration.

Market data and asset references

Our market section carries live prices alongside reference pages describing how each asset actually works — consensus mechanism, issuance schedule, supply cap, governance and the risks specific to its design. Those pages deliberately contain no price predictions and no figures that expire, so they remain accurate between the day they are written and the day you read them.

How this is paid for

Advertising and affiliate arrangements. Scores are produced before any commercial conversation, a partnership never changes one and a refusal to partner never changes one either — our editorial policy sets out the separation in detail. Nobody can buy placement, a higher score or the removal of a finding, and any provider who asks is excluded and named on the page.

New here? Start with how we rate, then browse the ranking pages or read who writes here.

Reference

Frequently asked

How are Crypto Almanac Daily ratings calculated?

Each provider is assessed against a fixed set of indicators recorded as met, partially met or failed, each with a source and a check date. Pillar scores are points earned over points available, and the overall score is their weighted sum. Nobody types a score directly, and the full evidence table is published on every review.

Can a company pay for a better rating?

No. Scores are produced before any commercial conversation, and a provider's willingness or refusal to enter a commercial arrangement has no effect on its assessment. Anyone who asks to pay for placement or the removal of a finding is excluded and identified on the page.

How often are the ratings updated?

Every review carries its verification date. Inside 90 days it has normal standing, between 91 and 180 days it is flagged for re-check, and past a year it is withdrawn until re-verified.

Is anything on this site financial advice?

No. Everything published here is research and reference material. It is not a recommendation, not tailored to anyone's circumstances, and we do not publish price predictions.

Why do some well-known companies score below smaller ones?

Because the rubric measures published evidence rather than reputation. A provider that blocks access to its own fee page or publishes no audit report scores lower than one that documents itself, and the review states exactly which indicators produced the gap.

Where does the market data come from?

Live prices and market statistics come from public market datasets, refreshed continuously. Editorial reference pages about each asset are written separately and deliberately exclude figures that go stale.