Evidence you can check, before you commit money.
Independent ratings of crypto exchanges, wallets and DeFi protocols, scored against a published rubric — alongside live market data and daily coverage from a named desk.
Rated against a published rubric
Every provider is scored on evidence a reader can check: linked audits, published fee schedules, regulator registers and reserve attestations. The full indicator table sits on each review.
Best Hardware Wallets
Best Crypto Wallets
Best Crypto Cards
Best Perpetual DEXs
Best Decentralised Exchanges
Best Lending Platforms
Best Yield Aggregators
Best Liquid Restaking Protocols
Best Liquid Staking Protocols
Best Staking Platforms
Best Stablecoins
Best Crypto Bridges
Best DeFi Protocols
Best NFT Marketplaces
Best Trading Tools
Best Instant Exchangers
Best NFT & AI Tools
Best Crypto Exchanges
From the newsroom

Bitcoin Tops $71,000 as SEC Unveils First Major Crypto Rule
Bitcoin shattered a six-week trading range to top $71,000, wiping out $3 billion in short bets, just as the SEC's new "Regulation Crypto Assets" proposal opens the door to a friendlier U.S. regulatory era.
Robinhood's Tenev and Andrew Cuomo Both Sound the Alarm: America Is Falling Behind on Crypto Rules
August 19, 2026Bitcoin Reclaims $64K as U.S. Treasury Unveils Landmark Stablecoin Rulebook
August 18, 2026Spot Bitcoin ETFs log record weekly inflows as basis trade widens
July 5, 2026Biggest moves in the top 100
From the almanac

Burner wallets: the case for a throwaway account
A burner wallet is a disposable account that holds almost nothing and does the risky interactions on your behalf. Used properly, it turns most wallet-drain incidents into a minor annoyance.

The 25th word: how wallet passphrases work
A passphrase turns one seed phrase into an unlimited number of separate wallets, and gives you a plausible answer to someone demanding your keys. It also has no recovery path whatsoever.

Multisig wallets: what they solve, and what they cost you
A multisig wallet requires several keys to approve a transaction, which removes the single point of failure at the heart of ordinary self-custody. It also introduces complexity that has lost people their funds.
Find your way around
Ratings
Almanac
Crypto Almanac Daily is a research desk covering the services people use to hold and trade digital assets. We rate providers against a published rubric, maintain reference pages for major assets, and report daily on the markets that move them. Everything is written for people who read before they act.
How our ratings differ from a top-ten list
Most rankings are opinions with numbers attached. Ours are computed: each provider is assessed against a fixed set of indicators, every indicator is recorded as met, partially met or failed with a source and a check date, and the score follows arithmetically from those records. The full evidence table sits on every review, so you can recompute the figure yourself or disagree with one specific indicator rather than with a verdict. The complete rubric — pillars, weights, gates and confidence grades — is published in full.
That has an uncomfortable consequence we publish rather than hide: a well-run company that documents itself poorly scores below a weaker one that publishes thoroughly. Where that happens, the review says so in plain terms instead of letting the number imply something it does not support.
What we score, and what we refuse to
We score what can be verified from public sources — regulator registers, audit reports, published fee schedules, reserve attestations, contract addresses. We do not score anything requiring an account, a private disclosure or our own unpublished measurements, because a figure nobody can check is not evidence. We also exclude country availability: a provider is not a worse counterparty because one regulator changed its mind, though we say so in the review when access is materially restricted.
Ratings age, so we date them
A score is a claim about a particular day, and every review carries the date it was verified. Inside 90 days a rating has normal standing. Past that it is flagged for re-check and loses eligibility for our editor's picks. Past a year it is withdrawn until someone verifies it again. Fees change, licences lapse and contracts are upgraded, and a rating that does not acknowledge that is decoration.
Market data and asset references
Our market section carries live prices alongside reference pages describing how each asset actually works — consensus mechanism, issuance schedule, supply cap, governance and the risks specific to its design. Those pages deliberately contain no price predictions and no figures that expire, so they remain accurate between the day they are written and the day you read them.
How this is paid for
Advertising and affiliate arrangements. Scores are produced before any commercial conversation, a partnership never changes one and a refusal to partner never changes one either — our editorial policy sets out the separation in detail. Nobody can buy placement, a higher score or the removal of a finding, and any provider who asks is excluded and named on the page.
New here? Start with how we rate, then browse the ranking pages or read who writes here.
Frequently asked
How are Crypto Almanac Daily ratings calculated?
Each provider is assessed against a fixed set of indicators recorded as met, partially met or failed, each with a source and a check date. Pillar scores are points earned over points available, and the overall score is their weighted sum. Nobody types a score directly, and the full evidence table is published on every review.
Can a company pay for a better rating?
No. Scores are produced before any commercial conversation, and a provider's willingness or refusal to enter a commercial arrangement has no effect on its assessment. Anyone who asks to pay for placement or the removal of a finding is excluded and identified on the page.
How often are the ratings updated?
Every review carries its verification date. Inside 90 days it has normal standing, between 91 and 180 days it is flagged for re-check, and past a year it is withdrawn until re-verified.
Is anything on this site financial advice?
No. Everything published here is research and reference material. It is not a recommendation, not tailored to anyone's circumstances, and we do not publish price predictions.
Why do some well-known companies score below smaller ones?
Because the rubric measures published evidence rather than reputation. A provider that blocks access to its own fee page or publishes no audit report scores lower than one that documents itself, and the review states exactly which indicators produced the gap.
Where does the market data come from?
Live prices and market statistics come from public market datasets, refreshed continuously. Editorial reference pages about each asset are written separately and deliberately exclude figures that go stale.