Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
Independent ranking

Best NFT Marketplaces

Marketplaces scored on linked audits and independently recorded data — never on trading volume, which is widely inflated.

Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last checked August 10, 2026
1N

NFTX

Best for audited marketplace contracts
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%10.0
Cost transparency · 25%9.0
Market quality · 20%7.0
Transparency & track record · 15%10.0
Public documentation surface · 10%10.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
  • Deployed across 2 chains
Cons
  • Several indicators could not be verified from public sources at this check
9.2/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
2S

Sudoswap V1

Best for audited marketplace contracts
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%10.0
Cost transparency · 25%9.0
Market quality · 20%4.0
Transparency & track record · 15%10.0
Public documentation surface · 10%10.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • Single-chain deployment
8.6/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
3B

Blur Bids

Best for independently tracked marketplace
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%6.0
Cost transparency · 25%9.0
Market quality · 20%10.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
  • Deployed across 2 chains
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
8.1/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
4N

NFT20

Best for independently tracked marketplace
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%6.0
Cost transparency · 25%9.0
Market quality · 20%6.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
  • Deployed across 2 chains
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
7.3/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
5M

Magic Eden

Best for independently tracked marketplace
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%6.0
Cost transparency · 25%9.0
Market quality · 20%5.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
  • Deployed across 5 chains
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
7.1/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
6I

ImmutableX

Best for audited marketplace contracts
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%8.0
Cost transparency · 25%7.0
Market quality · 20%4.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
Cons
  • Single-chain deployment
7.0/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7S

Salvor

Best for audited marketplace contracts
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%8.0
Cost transparency · 25%7.0
Market quality · 20%4.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
Cons
  • Single-chain deployment
7.0/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
8J

JPG Store

Best for audited marketplace contracts
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%8.0
Cost transparency · 25%7.0
Market quality · 20%4.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
Cons
  • Single-chain deployment
7.0/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
9N

NFT Hive

Best for independently tracked marketplace
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%6.0
Cost transparency · 25%9.0
Market quality · 20%4.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
6.9/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
10G

GumBall Protocol

Best for audited marketplace contracts
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%8.0
Cost transparency · 25%6.0
Market quality · 20%4.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • No application address published in the public record
  • Single-chain deployment
6.7/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
11T

Tensor

Best for independently tracked marketplace
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%6.0
Cost transparency · 25%9.0
Market quality · 20%3.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
6.7/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
12P

Punks Terminal

Best for independently tracked marketplace
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%4.0
Cost transparency · 25%7.0
Market quality · 20%5.0
Transparency & track record · 15%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%6.0
Pros
  • Tracked and verifiable from public sources at this check
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
5.4/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
13C

Caviar V1

Best for audited marketplace contracts
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%6.0
Cost transparency · 25%4.0
Market quality · 20%4.0
Transparency & track record · 15%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%6.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
Cons
  • No application address published in the public record
  • Single-chain deployment
5.1/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
14A

Anome

Best for independently tracked marketplace
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%4.0
Cost transparency · 25%7.0
Market quality · 20%3.0
Transparency & track record · 15%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%6.0
Pros
  • Tracked and verifiable from public sources at this check
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
5.1/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
15P

Paintswap on Sonic

Best for independently tracked marketplace
Counterparty & contract risk · 30%4.0
Cost transparency · 25%7.0
Market quality · 20%3.0
Transparency & track record · 15%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%6.0
Pros
  • Tracked and verifiable from public sources at this check
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
5.1/10
Overall
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
At a glance

Compare the field

ServiceScoreStrongest areaBest for
NFTX9.2Counterparty & contract risk (10.0)audited marketplace contracts
Sudoswap V18.6Counterparty & contract risk (10.0)audited marketplace contracts
Blur Bids8.1Market quality (10.0)independently tracked marketplace
NFT207.3Cost transparency (9.0)independently tracked marketplace
Magic Eden7.1Cost transparency (9.0)independently tracked marketplace
ImmutableX7.0Counterparty & contract risk (8.0)audited marketplace contracts
Salvor7.0Counterparty & contract risk (8.0)audited marketplace contracts
JPG Store7.0Counterparty & contract risk (8.0)audited marketplace contracts
NFT Hive6.9Cost transparency (9.0)independently tracked marketplace
GumBall Protocol6.7Counterparty & contract risk (8.0)audited marketplace contracts
Tensor6.7Cost transparency (9.0)independently tracked marketplace
Punks Terminal5.4Cost transparency (7.0)independently tracked marketplace
Caviar V15.1Counterparty & contract risk (6.0)audited marketplace contracts
Anome5.1Cost transparency (7.0)independently tracked marketplace
Paintswap on Sonic5.1Cost transparency (7.0)independently tracked marketplace