Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
S
Nft Marketplaces

Sudoswap V1

Best for audited marketplace contracts

Value locked:$0.7m at this checkChains:1Audits recorded:2Audit report linked:YesRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
8.6
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 30%10.0
Cost transparency · 25%9.0
Market quality · 20%4.0
Transparency & track record · 15%10.0
Public documentation surface · 10%10.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • Single-chain deployment
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 30% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Cost transparency · 25% weight9/10 points · 9.0/10
Market quality · 20% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
Transparency & track record · 15% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10

An NFT automated market maker using bonding curves, with published audits and pricing that adjusts automatically as items trade.

Our assessment

Sudoswap applies AMM mechanics to NFTs: a seller deposits items with a bonding curve, and each sale moves the price along that curve automatically. It has two audits with reports linked.

Bonding curves replace the asking price

Listing an NFT means picking one number and waiting. A curve lets a seller express a schedule — start here, rise as items sell, fall if nothing does — so the position adjusts without intervention. For anyone with multiple items from a collection, that is a fundamentally better tool than a static list.

Its role in the royalty argument

Sudoswap launched without enforced creator royalties, which was contentious and turned out to be directionally correct: royalty enforcement across the sector collapsed as marketplaces competed on fees. Buyers and traders benefited, creators lost recurring revenue, and the market settled the question rather than any protocol deciding it.

Concentrated liquidity, familiar risk

Depositing into a curve means your items sell as the price moves through your range, which is the NFT equivalent of divergence loss. In a falling market you end up holding the token side; in a rising one you sell into strength too early. Same mathematics, less liquid assets.

Who it suits

Sudoswap fits traders and collections managing inventory across many items who want automated pricing. Single-item sellers get more from a conventional marketplace listing.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
NFTX9.2audited marketplace contractsRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this rank marketplaces by trading volume?

No. NFT volume figures are widely inflated by wash trading and we do not rank on numbers we cannot verify. The score covers audits, methodology and independently recorded data.

Why is value locked low for large marketplaces?

Most marketplace trading settles without holding assets in contracts, so value locked understates activity. We publish it as the available independent figure, not as a measure of market share.

Are creator royalties assessed?

No. Royalty enforcement is a marketplace policy that changes frequently and is not verifiable from a single public source.