Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
N
Nft Marketplaces

NFT20

Best for independently tracked marketplace

Value locked:$0.1m at this checkChains:2Audits recorded:0Audit report linked:Not foundRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7.3
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 30%6.0
Cost transparency · 25%9.0
Market quality · 20%6.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
  • Deployed across 2 chains
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 30% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Cost transparency · 25% weight9/10 points · 9.0/10
Market quality · 20% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Transparency & track record · 15% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

An early NFT pooling protocol across two chains, now holding minimal value with no audit report retrievable at a public address.

Our assessment

NFT20 was among the first protocols to pool NFTs into fungible tokens, launched during the period when the mechanism was being invented. It now holds roughly $0.1m across two chains, with no audit report retrievable at a public address.

Being early is not the same as being durable

Several protocols pioneered NFT pooling and most did not retain the market. What separated the survivors was continued development, published audits and integrations rather than priority. NFT20's current position illustrates how quickly first-mover advantage evaporates without those.

Dormant protocols carry specific risks

A protocol with minimal activity may still hold funds and may no longer be actively maintained. Contracts continue running whether or not anyone is watching them, and known issues in dependencies may go unpatched. Anyone with assets in a low-activity protocol should consider withdrawing rather than waiting.

The evidence gap

No audit report at a public address, with thin transparency results. At this size the practical question is whether withdrawals still function reliably, and that is worth testing with a small amount before assuming.

Who it suits

NFT20 has limited current use for new participants. Users wanting NFT pooling should use NFTX, which publishes audits and holds more liquidity.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
NFTX9.2audited marketplace contractsRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this rank marketplaces by trading volume?

No. NFT volume figures are widely inflated by wash trading and we do not rank on numbers we cannot verify. The score covers audits, methodology and independently recorded data.

Why is value locked low for large marketplaces?

Most marketplace trading settles without holding assets in contracts, so value locked understates activity. We publish it as the available independent figure, not as a measure of market share.

Are creator royalties assessed?

No. Royalty enforcement is a marketplace policy that changes frequently and is not verifiable from a single public source.