Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
S
Stablecoins

Sky Dollar (USDS)

Best for collateralised issuance at scale

Circulating:$6,694m at this checkPeg mechanism:crypto-backedPeg type:peggedUSDChains:7Recorded price:1.0000 (0.00% from peg)Rubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
9.1
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & backing risk · 45%10.0
Cost transparency · 5%10.0
Market quality · 15%4.0
Transparency & track record · 30%10.0
Public documentation surface · 5%10.0
Pros
  • $6,694m circulating, recorded independently
  • Collateralised model (crypto-backed)
  • Issued across 7 chains
Cons
  • Reserve attestations are not scored in this category
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & backing risk · 45% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Cost transparency · 5% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Market quality · 15% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
Transparency & track record · 30% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Public documentation surface · 5% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10

The successor stablecoin to Dai within the Sky ecosystem, with $6.69bn circulating across seven chains and an integrated savings rate.

Our assessment

USDS has $6.69bn circulating across seven chains and traded at exactly 1.0000 at this check. It is the successor to Dai within the rebranded Sky ecosystem, running alongside it rather than replacing it outright.

A savings rate built into the stablecoin

USDS can be deposited to earn a governance-set savings rate funded from the protocol's revenue on its collateral. That makes the stablecoin itself yield-bearing rather than requiring a separate lending position — a significant convenience, and it means holders are exposed to the protocol's earning assets rather than merely to its peg.

Governance sets the rate, which means governance sets the risk

The savings rate is a policy decision, adjusted to manage demand and the protocol's balance sheet. It can be lowered. More importantly, sustaining an attractive rate requires collateral that earns — which pushes the protocol toward real-world assets and counterparty exposure that a purely crypto-backed design would avoid.

Two stablecoins from one system

Running Dai and USDS in parallel means shared collateral and shared governance across two tokens with different feature sets. Holders should understand which one they hold and what the conversion path is, because they are not interchangeable in every venue.

Who it suits

USDS fits users who want a decentralised stablecoin with built-in yield and are comfortable with the collateral mix. Users wanting the longest track record should hold Dai; those wanting regulated fiat backing, USDC.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
USD Coin (USDC)9.9collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Tether (USDT)9.9collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Ethena USDe (USDe)9.7collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Dai (DAI)9.7collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score assess the quality of reserves?

No. Reserve attestations vary too much between issuers to compare from one public source. The score covers backing model, scale and distribution; read the issuer's own reserve reporting separately.

Where does the data come from?

A public stablecoin dataset queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.

Why are algorithmic stablecoins scored lower?

The rubric credits collateralised backing explicitly. Algorithmic designs have the weakest track record and the indicator reflects that.