Sky Dollar (USDS)
Best for collateralised issuance at scale
How it rates
- $6,694m circulating, recorded independently
- Collateralised model (crypto-backed)
- Issued across 7 chains
- Reserve attestations are not scored in this category
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetPeg mechanism disclosed in the public dataset
Mechanism recorded as crypto-backed.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - MetBacking model is collateralised rather than algorithmic
Recorded as crypto-backed.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - MetCirculating supply published independently
$6,694m circulating at this check.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - Met
- MetPrice tracked and at peg in the public dataset
Recorded price 1.0000.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- MetTraded within 0.5% of peg at this check
Recorded price 1.0000; deviation 0.00%.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
The successor stablecoin to Dai within the Sky ecosystem, with $6.69bn circulating across seven chains and an integrated savings rate.
Our assessment
USDS has $6.69bn circulating across seven chains and traded at exactly 1.0000 at this check. It is the successor to Dai within the rebranded Sky ecosystem, running alongside it rather than replacing it outright.
A savings rate built into the stablecoin
USDS can be deposited to earn a governance-set savings rate funded from the protocol's revenue on its collateral. That makes the stablecoin itself yield-bearing rather than requiring a separate lending position — a significant convenience, and it means holders are exposed to the protocol's earning assets rather than merely to its peg.
Governance sets the rate, which means governance sets the risk
The savings rate is a policy decision, adjusted to manage demand and the protocol's balance sheet. It can be lowered. More importantly, sustaining an attractive rate requires collateral that earns — which pushes the protocol toward real-world assets and counterparty exposure that a purely crypto-backed design would avoid.
Two stablecoins from one system
Running Dai and USDS in parallel means shared collateral and shared governance across two tokens with different feature sets. Holders should understand which one they hold and what the conversion path is, because they are not interchangeable in every venue.
Who it suits
USDS fits users who want a decentralised stablecoin with built-in yield and are comfortable with the collateral mix. Users wanting the longest track record should hold Dai; those wanting regulated fiat backing, USDC.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score assess the quality of reserves?
No. Reserve attestations vary too much between issuers to compare from one public source. The score covers backing model, scale and distribution; read the issuer's own reserve reporting separately.
Where does the data come from?
A public stablecoin dataset queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.
Why are algorithmic stablecoins scored lower?
The rubric credits collateralised backing explicitly. Algorithmic designs have the weakest track record and the indicator reflects that.