Ethena USDe (USDe)
Best for collateralised issuance at scale
How it rates
- $3,916m circulating, recorded independently
- Collateralised model (crypto-backed)
- Issued across 31 chains
- Reserve attestations are not scored in this category
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetPeg mechanism disclosed in the public dataset
Mechanism recorded as crypto-backed.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - MetBacking model is collateralised rather than algorithmic
Recorded as crypto-backed.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - MetCirculating supply published independently
$3,916m circulating at this check.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - Met
- MetPrice tracked and at peg in the public dataset
Recorded price 0.9998.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- MetTraded within 0.5% of peg at this check
Recorded price 0.9998; deviation 0.02%.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
A synthetic dollar holding $3.92bn across 31 chains, maintaining its peg through a delta-neutral hedge rather than fiat reserves.
Our assessment
USDe has $3.92bn circulating across 31 chains and traded 0.02% from parity at this check. It is not backed by dollars in a bank: it holds crypto collateral hedged with short perpetual positions, so the combined value stays near a dollar regardless of price.
How a delta-neutral dollar works
Hold spot ETH and short an equivalent amount of ETH perpetual futures. The position's dollar value is stable because gains on one side offset losses on the other. The yield comes from perpetual funding, which longs typically pay to shorts in bullish markets. It is an elegant construction and a genuinely different answer to what a stablecoin can be.
The yield can invert
Funding rates are positive most of the time and not always. In a sustained bearish market, shorts pay longs and the protocol's income becomes an expense. There is also exchange counterparty risk: the hedges sit on centralised venues, so a venue failure is a direct hit to the backing. Both are disclosed, and both are the reason this is not a fiat-backed stablecoin however tight the peg looks.
What the record shows so far
The peg has held through several volatile periods and the mechanism has behaved as designed. It has not yet been through a prolonged bear market with sustained negative funding, which is the specific stress this design is built to survive and has not yet had to.
Who it suits
USDe fits users who understand the funding-rate mechanism and want yield-bearing dollar exposure. Users wanting a dollar backed by dollars should hold USDC, USDT or PYUSD.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score assess the quality of reserves?
No. Reserve attestations vary too much between issuers to compare from one public source. The score covers backing model, scale and distribution; read the issuer's own reserve reporting separately.
Where does the data come from?
A public stablecoin dataset queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.
Why are algorithmic stablecoins scored lower?
The rubric credits collateralised backing explicitly. Algorithmic designs have the weakest track record and the indicator reflects that.