Dai (DAI)
Best for collateralised issuance at scale
How it rates
- $4,791m circulating, recorded independently
- Collateralised model (crypto-backed)
- Issued across 49 chains
- Reserve attestations are not scored in this category
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetPeg mechanism disclosed in the public dataset
Mechanism recorded as crypto-backed.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - MetBacking model is collateralised rather than algorithmic
Recorded as crypto-backed.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - MetCirculating supply published independently
$4,791m circulating at this check.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - Met
- MetPrice tracked and at peg in the public dataset
Recorded price 0.9999.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- MetTraded within 0.5% of peg at this check
Recorded price 0.9999; deviation 0.01%.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
The longest-running decentralised stablecoin, with $4.79bn circulating across 49 chains and on-chain governance of its collateral and parameters.
Our assessment
Dai has $4.79bn circulating across 49 chains and traded at 0.9999 at this check — the tightest peg of any large stablecoin here. It is the oldest decentralised stablecoin still operating, and its collateral has changed profoundly since launch.
Overcollateralisation is the mechanism
Dai is minted against collateral worth more than the Dai issued, with liquidations enforcing the ratio automatically. No trust in an issuer's bank balance is required — the backing is on-chain and verifiable at any moment. That is the design that has kept the peg through market events that broke other decentralised stablecoins entirely.
The collateral is no longer only crypto
A substantial portion of backing now comes from real-world assets, including US Treasuries held through legal structures, and from centralised stablecoins. That improved stability and moved Dai's risk closer to the traditional financial system. Users who chose it for censorship resistance should understand that the backing today is not what it was in 2019.
March 2020 tested it properly
During the March 2020 crash, network congestion caused liquidation auctions to clear at near zero, leaving the system undercollateralised. It was recapitalised through a governance-run token auction. The mechanism did what it was designed to do under a severe stress, which is more than most stablecoins have demonstrated.
Who it suits
Dai fits users who want a stablecoin governed on-chain with verifiable collateral, accepting its real-world asset exposure. Users wanting purely crypto-backed exposure should read the current collateral composition first.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score assess the quality of reserves?
No. Reserve attestations vary too much between issuers to compare from one public source. The score covers backing model, scale and distribution; read the issuer's own reserve reporting separately.
Where does the data come from?
A public stablecoin dataset queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.
Why are algorithmic stablecoins scored lower?
The rubric credits collateralised backing explicitly. Algorithmic designs have the weakest track record and the indicator reflects that.