Falcon USD (USDf)
Best for collateralised issuance at scale
How it rates
- $1,255m circulating, recorded independently
- Collateralised model (crypto-backed)
- Issued across 2 chains
- Reserve attestations are not scored in this category
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetPeg mechanism disclosed in the public dataset
Mechanism recorded as crypto-backed.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - MetBacking model is collateralised rather than algorithmic
Recorded as crypto-backed.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - MetCirculating supply published independently
$1,255m circulating at this check.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins - Met
- MetPrice tracked and at peg in the public dataset
Recorded price 0.9963.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- MetTraded within 0.5% of peg at this check
Recorded price 0.9963; deviation 0.37%.
stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoins
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
A crypto-backed synthetic dollar with $1.26bn circulating across two chains, trading 0.37% below parity at this check.
Our assessment
USDf has $1.26bn circulating across two chains and traded at 0.9963 at this check — 0.37% below parity, the widest deviation of any conventional stablecoin in this comparison and roughly six times the next-largest.
A third of a percent is not noise
Established stablecoins hold within a few hundredths of a percent because arbitrage closes any gap immediately. A persistent 0.37% discount means arbitrage is not closing it, which points to a constraint: redemption limits, insufficient liquidity, or holders who doubt they can redeem at par. That is the market pricing something, and it deserves attention.
Synthetic dollars depend on their hedge
Crypto-backed synthetic designs maintain the peg through hedged positions rather than fiat reserves. The peg holds while the hedges work and the counterparties honour them. A discount can indicate that the market questions the hedge's robustness, or simply that secondary liquidity is thin — and from outside, the two look identical.
Yield-bearing dollars are not savings accounts
Where a synthetic dollar pays yield, that yield is compensation for the mechanism's risk. Comparing it to a bank deposit rate is a category error. The relevant comparison is against other yield strategies with similar risk, and on that basis the numbers are less remarkable.
Who it suits
USDf fits users who understand the mechanism, have checked the redemption terms, and can act on a discount. Users wanting a dollar that reliably trades at a dollar should hold USDC, USDT or Dai.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score assess the quality of reserves?
No. Reserve attestations vary too much between issuers to compare from one public source. The score covers backing model, scale and distribution; read the issuer's own reserve reporting separately.
Where does the data come from?
A public stablecoin dataset queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.
Why are algorithmic stablecoins scored lower?
The rubric credits collateralised backing explicitly. Algorithmic designs have the weakest track record and the indicator reflects that.