Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
F
Stablecoins

Falcon USD (USDf)

Best for collateralised issuance at scale

Circulating:$1,255m at this checkPeg mechanism:crypto-backedPeg type:peggedUSDChains:2Recorded price:0.9963 (0.37% from peg)Rubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
8.8
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & backing risk · 45%10.0
Cost transparency · 5%10.0
Market quality · 15%2.0
Transparency & track record · 30%10.0
Public documentation surface · 5%10.0
Pros
  • $1,255m circulating, recorded independently
  • Collateralised model (crypto-backed)
  • Issued across 2 chains
Cons
  • Reserve attestations are not scored in this category
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & backing risk · 45% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Cost transparency · 5% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Market quality · 15% weight2/10 points · 2.0/10
Transparency & track record · 30% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Public documentation surface · 5% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10

A crypto-backed synthetic dollar with $1.26bn circulating across two chains, trading 0.37% below parity at this check.

Our assessment

USDf has $1.26bn circulating across two chains and traded at 0.9963 at this check — 0.37% below parity, the widest deviation of any conventional stablecoin in this comparison and roughly six times the next-largest.

A third of a percent is not noise

Established stablecoins hold within a few hundredths of a percent because arbitrage closes any gap immediately. A persistent 0.37% discount means arbitrage is not closing it, which points to a constraint: redemption limits, insufficient liquidity, or holders who doubt they can redeem at par. That is the market pricing something, and it deserves attention.

Synthetic dollars depend on their hedge

Crypto-backed synthetic designs maintain the peg through hedged positions rather than fiat reserves. The peg holds while the hedges work and the counterparties honour them. A discount can indicate that the market questions the hedge's robustness, or simply that secondary liquidity is thin — and from outside, the two look identical.

Yield-bearing dollars are not savings accounts

Where a synthetic dollar pays yield, that yield is compensation for the mechanism's risk. Comparing it to a bank deposit rate is a category error. The relevant comparison is against other yield strategies with similar risk, and on that basis the numbers are less remarkable.

Who it suits

USDf fits users who understand the mechanism, have checked the redemption terms, and can act on a discount. Users wanting a dollar that reliably trades at a dollar should hold USDC, USDT or Dai.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
USD Coin (USDC)9.9collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Tether (USDT)9.9collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Ethena USDe (USDe)9.7collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Dai (DAI)9.7collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score assess the quality of reserves?

No. Reserve attestations vary too much between issuers to compare from one public source. The score covers backing model, scale and distribution; read the issuer's own reserve reporting separately.

Where does the data come from?

A public stablecoin dataset queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.

Why are algorithmic stablecoins scored lower?

The rubric credits collateralised backing explicitly. Algorithmic designs have the weakest track record and the indicator reflects that.