Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
U
Stablecoins

United Stables (U)

Best for collateralised issuance at scale

Circulating:$1,210m at this checkPeg mechanism:crypto-backedPeg type:peggedUSDChains:3Recorded price:0.9996 (0.04% from peg)Rubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
8.8
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & backing risk · 45%10.0
Cost transparency · 5%10.0
Market quality · 15%2.0
Transparency & track record · 30%10.0
Public documentation surface · 5%10.0
Pros
  • $1,210m circulating, recorded independently
  • Collateralised model (crypto-backed)
  • Issued across 3 chains
Cons
  • Reserve attestations are not scored in this category
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & backing risk · 45% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Cost transparency · 5% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Market quality · 15% weight2/10 points · 2.0/10
Transparency & track record · 30% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Public documentation surface · 5% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10

A crypto-backed stablecoin with $1.21bn circulating across three chains, holding its peg closely over a comparatively short history.

Our assessment

United Stables has $1.21bn circulating across three chains and traded 0.04% from parity at this check. It has achieved real scale quickly, which is the thing to examine rather than to take as reassurance.

Fast growth in stablecoins usually has a driver

A billion dollars does not accumulate through organic preference. It comes from incentives, from an ecosystem mandating its use, or from a yield that exceeds alternatives. Identifying which applies tells you whether the circulation persists when the driver stops — and stablecoin liquidity that leaves is exactly the liquidity you needed to exit.

Crypto-backed means the collateral is the product

For a crypto-backed dollar, everything depends on what secures it: overcollateralisation ratio, collateral composition, liquidation mechanics, and whether the collateral is correlated with the token's own ecosystem. These are readable on-chain, which is the advantage of the design over fiat backing — and it requires actually reading them.

A short history is a real limitation

Stablecoins are judged by behaviour in crises. Established tokens have been through exchange collapses, bank failures and coordinated attacks. A newer token has not, and no amount of current peg tightness substitutes for that. This is the one form of evidence that cannot be accelerated.

Who it suits

United Stables fits users within its ecosystem who have read the collateral composition. Users wanting a stablecoin proven through multiple crises should hold USDT, USDC or Dai.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
USD Coin (USDC)9.9collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Tether (USDT)9.9collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Ethena USDe (USDe)9.7collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Dai (DAI)9.7collateralised issuance at scaleRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score assess the quality of reserves?

No. Reserve attestations vary too much between issuers to compare from one public source. The score covers backing model, scale and distribution; read the issuer's own reserve reporting separately.

Where does the data come from?

A public stablecoin dataset queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.

Why are algorithmic stablecoins scored lower?

The rubric credits collateralised backing explicitly. Algorithmic designs have the weakest track record and the indicator reflects that.