Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
Z
Wallets

Zerion

Best for open-source verification

Source code:Public repositoryDocumentation:Not identifiedSecurity page:Not identifiedPublisher:ZerionRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence CRubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
5.3
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Key custody & openness · 35%6.0
Cost transparency · 5%6.0
Product openness · 25%6.0
Publisher transparency · 20%4.0
Public documentation surface · 15%4.0
Pros
  • Source published in a public repository
Cons
  • No dedicated security page identified at this check
  • Terms not found at the conventional address at this check
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Key custody & openness · 35% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
  • Met
    Source code published in a public repository

    Repository reachable at this check.

    github.com/zeriontech
  • Not met
    Security documentation or disclosure page published

    Not identified at this check.

  • Not met
    User documentation reachable without an account

    Not identified at this check.

  • Met
    Publisher identifiable from its own repository organisation

    Repository published under Zerion.

    github.com/zeriontech
  • Met
    Product site reachable for independent verification

    HTTP 2xx at this check.

    zerion.io/
Cost transparency · 5% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
  • Met
    Product site public

    Reachable at this check.

    zerion.io/
  • Not met
    Terms or legal documentation public

    Not found at the conventional address at this check.

  • Not met
    Documentation states how the product is funded or priced

    Not identified at this check.

  • Met
    No account required to read product information

    No account required at this check.

    zerion.io/
  • Met
    Support resource public

    Reachable at this check.

    zerion.io/
Product openness · 25% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
  • Met
    Public repository organisation

    Organisation public.

    github.com/zeriontech
  • Met
    Repository is the publisher's own

    Published by the vendor.

    github.com/zeriontech
  • Met
    Release history publicly visible

    Repository carries public history.

    github.com/zeriontech
  • Not met
    Documentation site published

    Not identified at this check.

  • Not met
    Security posture stated publicly

    No dedicated security page identified at this check.

Publisher transparency · 20% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
  • Met
    Publisher entity identifiable

    Identifiable as Zerion.

    github.com/zeriontech
  • Met
    Site resolves to automated verification

    HTTP 2xx at this check.

    zerion.io/
  • Not met
    Security or disclosure page published

    Not identified at this check.

  • Not met
    Terms or legal documentation published

    Not found at the conventional address at this check.

  • Not met
    Support or help resource published

    Not identified at this check.

Public documentation surface · 15% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
  • Met
    Product site reachable

    HTTP 2xx at this check.

    zerion.io/
  • Not met
    Documentation reachable

    Not identified.

  • Met
    Public repository reachable

    HTTP 2xx at this check.

    github.com/zeriontech
  • Not met
    Security page reachable

    Not identified.

  • Not met
    Legal documentation reachable

    Not found at the conventional address.

A self-custodial wallet built around DeFi portfolio tracking, consolidating tokens, NFTs, LP positions and debt across more than 40 networks.

Our assessment

Zerion started as a DeFi portfolio tracker and grew a wallet around it, which is the reverse of how most wallets evolve and shows in the product. It consolidates tokens, NFTs, LP positions, staked assets, rewards and debt across more than 40 networks in a single view.

Position tracking is the differentiator

Most wallets show token balances. Zerion shows positions — an LP in a pool, a staked asset with accrued rewards, a debt against collateral — which is how a DeFi portfolio actually looks. Anyone with capital deployed across several protocols knows the alternative is a spreadsheet nobody keeps current.

Self-custodial, with public audits

Keys stay with the user and Zerion cannot move funds. The browser extension is open source and independent audits are published. Hardware wallet integration is supported, which is the right combination: track everything in one interface, hold the keys somewhere else.

What it does not cover, and what we could not check

It reads on-chain positions only, so centralised exchange balances are absent — a real gap if a meaningful share of your holdings sits on an exchange. On the evidence side, twelve indicators failed: no reachable documentation site, security page, legal terms, or statement of how the product is funded.

Who it suits

Zerion fits DeFi users with positions spread across many protocols who want one honest view of them. Users who mainly need a signing wallet, not a dashboard, will be better served by MetaMask, Rabby or Trust Wallet.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
Trust Wallet9.9open-source verificationRead →
MetaMask9.9open-source verificationRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Zerion is safe?

No. It measures what a user can verify before installing: published source, documented security posture, open documentation and an identifiable publisher. Runtime key handling is not tested by us.

Why does open source matter for a wallet?

It is the one substantive property an outsider can check without reverse-engineering the app. Everything else requires trusting the publisher or a third-party audit.

What would raise this score?

Publishing source, a dedicated security page, open documentation and terms at stable public addresses — all checkable by anyone.