Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
S
Staking

Supra Staking

Best for independently tracked protocol

Total value locked:$4m at this checkChains:1Audits recorded:0Audit report linked:Not foundRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
5.2
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 35%4.0
Cost transparency · 20%7.0
Market quality · 15%4.0
Transparency & track record · 20%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%6.0
Pros
  • Tracked and verifiable from public sources at this check
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 35% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
Cost transparency · 20% weight7/10 points · 7.0/10
Market quality · 15% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
Transparency & track record · 20% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10

A staking product holding $4m tied to an oracle and infrastructure network, with no audit report retrievable publicly.

Our assessment

Supra staking holds $4m, tied to a network providing oracle and infrastructure services. No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check.

Staking an infrastructure network is a bet on adoption

Where a token's value derives from services sold to other protocols, staking it is a position on whether those services get adopted. That is a venture-style exposure rather than the diversified network exposure of staking a general-purpose chain, and the yield does not compensate for the concentration.

Oracle networks carry specific responsibilities

An oracle's failure propagates: incorrect prices cause wrongful liquidations and enable manipulation across every protocol that consumes the feed. Staking on such a network means participating in a system whose failures are felt far beyond its own users, which raises rather than lowers the standard for published review.

The evidence gap

No audit report at a public address, with thin transparency results, at a small scale that also implies limited adversarial testing.

Who it suits

Supra staking fits holders who want to support that network and accept unaudited contracts at small size. Holders seeking diversified staking should stake a general-purpose network instead.

Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Supra Staking is safe?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.

Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?

A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.