Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
S
Dex

SUNSwap V3

Best for documented on-chain trading

Total value locked:$216m at this checkChains:1Audits recorded:0Audit report linked:Not foundRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
5.0
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 30%4.0
Cost transparency · 20%4.0
Market quality · 25%6.0
Transparency & track record · 15%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%6.0
Pros
  • Tracked and verifiable from public sources at this check
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • No documentation site found at a conventional address
  • Single-chain deployment
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 30% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
Cost transparency · 20% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
Market quality · 25% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Transparency & track record · 15% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10

The principal decentralised exchange on TRON, holding $216m on a network carrying very large stablecoin transfer volumes.

Our assessment

SunSwap is the main DEX on TRON, holding $216m. TRON carries some of the largest stablecoin transfer volumes of any network — particularly for remittance and cross-border flows — and that traffic shapes what this venue is used for.

A chain used for payments more than for DeFi

Most TRON activity is transferring dollar-pegged tokens cheaply, not complex DeFi. The DEX exists mainly to convert between assets in support of that flow. Judged as a DeFi venue it is unremarkable; judged as infrastructure for a large payments corridor it is doing something real.

Concentration around one ecosystem

TRON's governance and its major protocols are closely associated with a single figure and a small group of entities. That concentration is a well-documented characteristic of the network rather than an allegation, and it means protocol-level decisions come from a narrower set of actors than on more diffuse chains.

What the evidence shows

No audit report was retrievable at a public address, and the transparency indicators are thin. Our rubric records what can be checked, and here that is little relative to the value held — which is what produces a 5.0 despite the venue's central role on its chain.

Who it suits

SunSwap fits TRON users converting between assets on that network, especially around stablecoin flows. DeFi users with a choice of chains will find better-documented venues elsewhere in this table.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
Uniswap V39.8audited, multi-chain deploymentRead →
Curve DEX9.6audited, multi-chain deploymentRead →
PancakeSwap AMM9.6audited, multi-chain deploymentRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean SUNSwap V3 is safe to use?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published documentation and independently recorded market data. Contract behaviour is not tested by us.

Where does the TVL figure come from?

An independent public analytics platform, queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public dataset. It records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit was ever performed.