Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
S
Defi Protocols

Steakhouse Financial

Best for independently tracked protocol

Value locked:$3,195m at this checkChains:10Audits recorded:0Audit report linked:Not foundRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7.8
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 35%6.0
Cost transparency · 15%9.0
Market quality · 20%10.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
  • $3,195m recorded independently
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 35% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Cost transparency · 15% weight9/10 points · 9.0/10
Market quality · 20% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Transparency & track record · 20% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

A risk curator managing $3.20bn across 10 chains in lending vaults, where its allocation decisions determine depositor outcomes.

Our assessment

Steakhouse curates $3.20bn across 10 chains. It does not run its own lending protocol — it manages vaults on modular platforms, choosing collateral, oracles and parameters on depositors' behalf. Curation is now one of the largest and least-scrutinised roles in DeFi.

The curator is the risk manager

On modular lending platforms, the base protocol is deliberately minimal and every decision that matters is made by the curator: which collateral, what loan-to-value, which oracle, what caps. A depositor choosing a vault is hiring a risk manager, and the platform's audit says nothing about that manager's judgement.

Incentives point toward yield

Curators typically earn a share of the yield they generate, which rewards higher returns and does not directly penalise risk until a loss occurs. That is a familiar asymmetry from traditional asset management, and DeFi has already seen curated vaults take exposures that later produced losses. Read the mandate and the actual allocations, not the headline rate.

Evidence position

No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check. For a curator, what a reader most needs is not a contract audit but published methodology, current allocations and a documented history of decisions — the material that would let someone judge the judgement.

Who it suits

Steakhouse fits depositors who will read a specific vault's mandate and allocations before entering. Users wanting a single governed risk surface should deposit directly into Aave or Compound.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
Ondo Yield Assets9.3audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Sky Lending9.3audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Steakhouse Financial is safe?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded data. Contract and custody risk are not tested by us.

Where do these figures come from?

A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Anyone can re-run the query.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public record. It records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.