Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
S
Staking

Starknet BTC Staking

Best for independently tracked protocol

Total value locked:$45m at this checkChains:1Audits recorded:0Audit report linked:Not foundRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
6.7
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 35%6.0
Cost transparency · 20%9.0
Market quality · 15%3.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 35% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Cost transparency · 20% weight9/10 points · 9.0/10
Market quality · 15% weight3/10 points · 3.0/10
Transparency & track record · 20% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

A staking mechanism holding $45m that uses Bitcoin to help secure a Layer 2 network, with no audit report retrievable publicly.

Our assessment

Starknet BTC staking holds $45m, using Bitcoin as a staking asset to help secure a Layer 2 network. Bitcoin has no native staking, so any such mechanism has to be constructed — and how it is constructed is the entire risk.

Bitcoin cannot stake natively

Bitcoin's consensus is proof of work with no staking, slashing or delegation. Making Bitcoin secure another network requires wrapping, bridging or a separate arrangement that ties Bitcoin holdings to behaviour on the other chain. Each approach introduces components — custody, bridges, oracles — that Bitcoin itself does not have and that have historically been where losses occur.

Understand which mechanism you are using

The safety difference between a self-custodial timelock arrangement and a wrapped token held by a bridge is enormous, and both are described as Bitcoin staking. A holder should establish exactly where their bitcoin sits and who can move it before considering the yield.

The evidence gap

No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check. For a novel cross-chain security mechanism, published review of the custody and bridging arrangements would be the most valuable evidence available.

Who it suits

This fits Bitcoin holders who want yield, understand the specific mechanism, and accept bridge or custody exposure. Holders unwilling to take that exposure should not stake Bitcoin at all — the alternative is holding it.

Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Starknet BTC Staking is safe?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.

Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?

A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.