Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
S
Nft Ai Tools

SimpleHash

Best for published documentation

Service page:ReachableDocumentation:PublishedTerms:PublishedCorporate entity:Not established at this checkRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7.8
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & operator risk · 30%7.0
Cost transparency · 20%9.0
Product transparency · 25%8.0
Operator transparency · 15%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%10.0
Pros
  • Service reachable without an account
  • Developer or user documentation published
  • Terms published
Cons
  • Corporate entity not established from public sources
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & operator risk · 30% weight7/10 points · 7.0/10
  • Met
    Service reachable at a public address

    Reachable at this check.

    simplehash.com/
  • Met
    Documentation published

    Reachable at this check.

    docs.simplehash.com/
  • Met
    Terms published

    Reachable at this check.

    simplehash.com/terms
  • Partial
    Operator identifiable from published material

    Service published under its own domain; corporate entity not established.

    simplehash.com/
  • Not met
    Data provenance disclosed

    Not established from public sources at this check.

Cost transparency · 20% weight9/10 points · 9.0/10
Product transparency · 25% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Operator transparency · 15% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
  • Met
    Service resolves to automated verification

    HTTP 2xx.

    simplehash.com/
  • Met
    Terms published

    Reachable.

    simplehash.com/terms
  • Met
    Documentation published

    Reachable.

    docs.simplehash.com/
  • Not met
    Corporate entity identifiable

    Not established at this check.

  • Not met
    Funding or ownership disclosed

    Not established at this check.

Public documentation surface · 10% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10

An NFT data infrastructure provider serving indexed metadata and pricing to wallets and applications, with published documentation and terms.

Our assessment

SimpleHash provides the indexed NFT data that other applications consume: metadata, ownership, pricing and media across many chains. Most users encounter it inside a wallet or marketplace without knowing it is there. Documentation and terms are published and reachable.

Indexing NFTs is harder than it sounds

NFT metadata lives off-chain, often on IPFS, in inconsistent formats, with images that may or may not resolve. Turning that into reliable, queryable data across dozens of chains is genuine infrastructure work, and it is why most applications buy it rather than build it.

Infrastructure dependencies concentrate quietly

When many wallets and marketplaces rely on the same data provider, an outage or an error propagates across products that appear unrelated. Users see a broken wallet; the cause is a shared upstream. This is a normal software-industry dynamic and worth naming, because it is invisible from the user's side.

Evidence position

Documentation and terms published and reachable, with the corporate entity not established from public sources at this check. For a paid infrastructure service, published documentation and terms are the baseline, and it meets it.

Who it suits

SimpleHash fits developers building NFT features who need reliable multi-chain data. End users do not choose it directly and benefit when the products they use do.

Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score assess SimpleHash's data quality?

No. Data accuracy would require a controlled comparison we do not run. The score covers what is published and reachable before use.

Why is this category smaller than the others?

We check candidates before listing them. Four services we tested for this table no longer respond at all, so the table has fourteen entries rather than fifteen.

Why do all entrants score zero on corporate entity?

Because this class of tool rarely publishes it. The indicator is identical for everyone in the category, so the comparison stays fair.