Sanctum Infinity
Best for documented on-chain trading
How it rates
- Documentation published at a public address
- No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- Not metIndependent audit published with a linked report
No audit report linked in the public protocol dataset at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/sanctum-infinity - Not metAudit count recorded in an independent dataset
0 audit(s) recorded.
defillama.com/protocol/sanctum-infinity - MetProtocol tracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/sanctum-infinity - Met
- Met
- MetDocumentation published where fees are described
Documentation reachable for fee review.
learn.sanctum.so/ - Met
- MetIndependent dataset publishes protocol economics
TVL and change history published independently.
defillama.com/protocol/sanctum-infinity - PartialFee model documented publicly
Documentation available; specific fee tiers not captured at this check.
learn.sanctum.so/ - Met
- MetTracked with published total value locked
TVL $156m at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/sanctum-infinity - Met
- Not met
- Not met
- MetListed on the independent dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/sanctum-infinity
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/sanctum-infinity - Not metAudit documentation linked publicly
No audit report linked at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/sanctum-infinity - Met
- MetProtocol identity and chains disclosed
Chains and category published: Dexs.
defillama.com/protocol/sanctum-infinity - Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
A Solana liquidity layer holding $156m in a shared pool that lets any supported liquid staking token trade against any other instantly.
Our assessment
Sanctum Infinity solves a specific problem: Solana has dozens of liquid staking tokens and each one used to need its own liquidity. Infinity is a single pool holding many of them, so any supported LST can be swapped for any other without a dedicated market.
Shared liquidity beats fragmented liquidity
Without it, a new liquid staking token launches with no exit route, which forces users toward the incumbents and entrenches them. A shared pool means a small validator's LST is tradeable from day one. That is a structural contribution to Solana staking decentralisation, not just a trading convenience.
The risk is inside the pool
Every asset in a shared pool is exposed to every other. If one supported LST loses value — a validator failure, a slashing event, a bug in its own contract — the pool absorbs it and every depositor shares the loss. The economics depend entirely on how carefully assets are admitted, which is a governance question rather than a code one.
No audit report linked
No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check. For a pooled-risk design where admission criteria determine the safety of everyone's deposit, published review of both the contracts and the listing process would be worth a great deal.
Who it suits
Sanctum Infinity fits Solana stakers moving between liquid staking tokens or supporting smaller validators. Users who simply want to stake should compare individual liquid staking providers directly.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Sanctum Infinity is safe to use?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published documentation and independently recorded market data. Contract behaviour is not tested by us.
Where does the TVL figure come from?
An independent public analytics platform, queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public dataset. It records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit was ever performed.