Rakeoff
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- Accounting methodology published
- No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- Not metIndependent audit report linked publicly
No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/rakeoff - Not met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/rakeoff - Met
- Met
- Met
- MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/rakeoff - Met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
rakeoff.io - Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- MetListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/rakeoff
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/rakeoff - Not met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
A staking protocol holding $5m that simplifies Internet Computer staking, where the native process involves unusually complex mechanics.
Our assessment
RakeOff holds $5m and exists to simplify staking on the Internet Computer, where the native process involves neurons, dissolve delays and voting configuration that most holders find difficult to navigate correctly.
Complexity is a real barrier to staking
Where a network's staking mechanics are hard to understand, holders either avoid staking or configure it wrongly — locking capital for longer than intended, or missing rewards through a misconfigured setting. A protocol that abstracts this increases participation, which is a genuine contribution to network security.
Abstraction means someone else holds the settings
The parameters the protocol chooses on your behalf — lock duration, voting behaviour, reward handling — determine your outcome. Read them. On networks where staking terms are long, a default chosen for the protocol's convenience can commit your capital for a period you did not intend.
Evidence position
No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check. At $5m with a small user base, there is limited adversarial testing to substitute for that review, which is the combination our rubric treats most cautiously.
Who it suits
RakeOff fits Internet Computer holders who want staking simplified and accept unaudited contracts at small size. Holders comfortable with the native process should stake directly and avoid the extra layer.
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Rakeoff is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.