Quickswap Dex
Best for audited, multi-chain deployment
How it rates
- Audit report linked from a public dataset
- Documentation published at a public address
- Deployed across 2 chains
- Several indicators could not be verified from public sources at this check
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetIndependent audit published with a linked report
Audit report linked from the public protocol dataset.
docs.quickswap.exchange/concepts/advanced-topics/04-security - MetAudit count recorded in an independent dataset
3 audit(s) recorded.
defillama.com/protocol/quickswap-dex - MetProtocol tracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/quickswap-dex - Met
- MetApplication reachable at a public address
Reachable without an account at this check.
quickswap.exchange/
- MetDocumentation published where fees are described
Documentation reachable for fee review.
docs.quickswap.exchange/ - Met
- MetIndependent dataset publishes protocol economics
TVL and change history published independently.
defillama.com/protocol/quickswap-dex - PartialFee model documented publicly
Documentation available; specific fee tiers not captured at this check.
docs.quickswap.exchange/ - Met
- MetTracked with published total value locked
TVL $194m at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/quickswap-dex - Met
- Met
- Not met
- PartialListed on the independent dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/quickswap-dex
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/quickswap-dex - MetAudit documentation linked publicly
Audit report linked.
docs.quickswap.exchange/concepts/advanced-topics/04-security - Met
- MetProtocol identity and chains disclosed
Chains and category published: Dexs.
defillama.com/protocol/quickswap-dex - Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
Polygon's established decentralised exchange, holding $194m across two chains with three recorded audits and reports published.
Our assessment
QuickSwap has three recorded audits with reports linked — more than any other DEX in this comparison — holding $194m across two chains. It is the established venue on Polygon, where transaction costs make small trades practical.
Three audits is the outlier here
Most DEXs in this table record zero or two audits, and eight have no linked report at all. Three independent reviews with published reports is the strongest contract-risk evidence in the category. Audits do not prevent exploits — Curve's 2023 incident came through a compiler, not the contracts — but they are the only pre-deployment evidence that exists.
Being a chain's home venue
A DEX that is the default on its network gets the routing, the integrations and the long-tail listings that no amount of marketing buys elsewhere. It also ties the protocol's fortunes to that chain: QuickSwap's depth is a function of Polygon's activity, and a migration of users to another network would take the liquidity with it.
Modest size, solid evidence
$194m is a fraction of the leaders here, and our market-quality pillar records that plainly at 25% of the score. What lifts the total is the evidence: audits published, documentation reachable, fee structure stated. A small venue that documents itself properly outscores a large one that does not.
Who it suits
QuickSwap fits Polygon users who want a well-audited home venue with cheap execution. Traders needing depth on major pairs or coverage across many chains should use Uniswap, PancakeSwap or Curve.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Quickswap Dex is safe to use?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published documentation and independently recorded market data. Contract behaviour is not tested by us.
Where does the TVL figure come from?
An independent public analytics platform, queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public dataset. It records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit was ever performed.