Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
K
Liquid Restaking

Kelp

Best for audited protocol with published methodology

Total value locked:$888m at this checkChains:1Audits recorded:2Audit report linked:YesRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
9.2
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 35%10.0
Cost transparency · 20%9.0
Market quality · 15%6.0
Transparency & track record · 20%10.0
Public documentation surface · 10%10.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • Accounting methodology published
  • TVL of $888m recorded independently
Cons
  • Single-chain deployment
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 35% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Cost transparency · 20% weight9/10 points · 9.0/10
Market quality · 15% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Transparency & track record · 20% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10

A liquid restaking protocol holding $888m, distributing restaked ETH across multiple operators and services with published audit reports.

Our assessment

Kelp holds $888m with two audits and reports linked, the strongest evidence profile in liquid restaking. Its token represents ETH that is staked and then restaked to secure additional services, earning a second layer of rewards for a second layer of risk.

What restaking actually adds

Staked ETH secures Ethereum. Restaking pledges that same stake as security for other services, which pay for it. The extra yield is a fee for accepting extra slashing conditions — you are now exposed to the correctness of every service your stake underwrites, not just to Ethereum consensus.

Slashing risk is the part people skip

Ethereum slashing is well understood and rare. The slashing rules of newly launched services are neither. A protocol distributing your stake across several of them is distributing your exposure across several immature risk models, and no yield figure communicates that. This is the single most important thing to understand before holding any restaking token.

Diversification across operators helps

Spreading across multiple operators and services means one failure does not take everything, which is the right structure given the uncertainty. It reduces the severity of a bad outcome rather than its probability.

Who it suits

Kelp fits users who understand restaking's compounded slashing exposure and want the best-documented option in the category. Users who want yield without additional slashing conditions should stake normally through Lido, Rocket Pool or StakeWise.

Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Kelp is safe?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.

Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?

A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.