Kelp
Best for audited protocol with published methodology
How it rates
- Audit report linked from a public dataset
- Accounting methodology published
- TVL of $888m recorded independently
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetIndependent audit report linked publicly
Audit report linked from the public protocol dataset.
kelp.gitbook.io/kelp/audits - Met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/kelp - Met
- MetApplication reachable at a public address
Reachable without an account at this check.
kelpdao.xyz/restake/?utm_source=0x798fF1e6D7AFd28c333eE6eBe03125d30ec6eF
- MetApplication reachable without an account
Reachable without an account at this check.
kelpdao.xyz/restake/?utm_source=0x798fF1e6D7AFd28c333eE6eBe03125d30ec6eF - MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/kelp - Met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
kelpdao.xyz/restake/?utm_source=0x798fF1e6D7AFd28c333eE6eBe03125d30ec6eF - MetNo account required to reach the application
Reachable without an account at this check.
kelpdao.xyz/restake/?utm_source=0x798fF1e6D7AFd28c333eE6eBe03125d30ec6eF
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- MetListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/kelp
- Met
- Met
- Met
- MetApplication address published
Public application address.
kelpdao.xyz/restake/?utm_source=0x798fF1e6D7AFd28c333eE6eBe03125d30ec6eF - Met
- MetApplication reachable
Reachable without an account at this check.
kelpdao.xyz/restake/?utm_source=0x798fF1e6D7AFd28c333eE6eBe03125d30ec6eF - Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
A liquid restaking protocol holding $888m, distributing restaked ETH across multiple operators and services with published audit reports.
Our assessment
Kelp holds $888m with two audits and reports linked, the strongest evidence profile in liquid restaking. Its token represents ETH that is staked and then restaked to secure additional services, earning a second layer of rewards for a second layer of risk.
What restaking actually adds
Staked ETH secures Ethereum. Restaking pledges that same stake as security for other services, which pay for it. The extra yield is a fee for accepting extra slashing conditions — you are now exposed to the correctness of every service your stake underwrites, not just to Ethereum consensus.
Slashing risk is the part people skip
Ethereum slashing is well understood and rare. The slashing rules of newly launched services are neither. A protocol distributing your stake across several of them is distributing your exposure across several immature risk models, and no yield figure communicates that. This is the single most important thing to understand before holding any restaking token.
Diversification across operators helps
Spreading across multiple operators and services means one failure does not take everything, which is the right structure given the uncertainty. It reduces the severity of a bad outcome rather than its probability.
Who it suits
Kelp fits users who understand restaking's compounded slashing exposure and want the best-documented option in the category. Users who want yield without additional slashing conditions should stake normally through Lido, Rocket Pool or StakeWise.
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Kelp is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.