JustCryptos
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- $2,087m recorded independently
- No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
- No accounting methodology published at this check
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- Not metIndependent audit report linked publicly
No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/justcryptos - Not met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published value and history.
defillama.com/protocol/justcryptos - Not met
- MetApplication reachable at a public address
Reachable without an account at this check.
just.network/token
- MetApplication reachable without an account
Reachable without an account at this check.
just.network/token - MetProtocol economics published independently
Value and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/justcryptos - Not met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
just.network/token - MetNo account required to reach the application
Reachable without an account at this check.
just.network/token
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Met
A wrapped asset protocol on TRON holding $2.09bn, with no audit report retrievable at a public address at this check.
Our assessment
JustCryptos holds $2.09bn of wrapped assets on TRON. No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check, and the transparency indicators returned little.
Wrapped assets are custody claims
Wrapped Bitcoin, Ethereum and other assets on TRON are claims against holdings elsewhere. The token's value depends entirely on those holdings existing and being redeemable. Without published proof of reserves or an audit, a holder has no way to verify either — and $2.09bn is a substantial amount to hold on that basis.
Ecosystem concentration reaches the backing
TRON's major protocols are closely associated with a small group of entities, and that concentration extends to who controls the custody behind wrapped assets. For a custody product, the identity and independence of the custodian is the entire question.
Proof of reserves would change this
For any wrapped asset, regularly published proof that the underlying holdings match tokens issued is the single most valuable disclosure — more so than a contract audit. Its absence at this scale is what places this near the bottom of our bridge comparison.
Who it suits
JustCryptos is used by necessity within the TRON ecosystem. Users with a choice should prefer wrapped assets that publish proof of reserves, such as WBTC.
How rivals compare
| Service | Score | Best for | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portal | 9.6 | audited protocol with published methodology | Read → |
Frequently asked
Does this score mean JustCryptos is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded data. Contract and custody risk are not tested by us.
Where do these figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Anyone can re-run the query.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. It records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.