Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
J
Liquid Staking

Jupiter Staked SOL

Best for independently tracked protocol

Total value locked:$397m at this checkChains:1Audits recorded:0Audit report linked:Not foundRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7.2
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 35%6.0
Cost transparency · 20%9.0
Market quality · 15%6.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Accounting methodology published
  • TVL of $397m recorded independently
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 35% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Cost transparency · 20% weight9/10 points · 9.0/10
Market quality · 15% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Transparency & track record · 20% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

A Solana liquid staking token issued by the network's largest trading aggregator, holding $397m with no linked audit report at this check.

Our assessment

Jupiter Staked SOL holds $397m, issued by the protocol that routes a large share of Solana's trading volume. The distribution advantage is obvious; the published evidence is thin.

Distribution is the advantage

A staking derivative launched by the venue where most Solana trading happens starts with routing, integration and visibility that independent issuers spend years building. For users, that means good secondary liquidity from the start — the practical measure of whether a staking derivative is usable.

Concentration within one ecosystem

The same entity operating the dominant aggregator, a large perpetuals venue and a staking derivative accumulates influence across the chain's activity. That is not misconduct; it is a structural fact worth knowing, particularly since the same operator's other products in this comparison also lack published audits.

No audit report at this check

No audit report was retrievable at a public address. Staking derivatives carry specific risks — accounting for rewards, handling validator slashing, and the redemption path — and a published review speaks to exactly those mechanics.

Who it suits

Jupiter Staked SOL fits Solana users deep in that ecosystem who value integration and have formed their own view on unaudited contracts. Users who want published audits on the same chain should use Jito.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
Lido9.6audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Stader9.5audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
StakeWise V29.4audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Jupiter Staked SOL is safe?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.

Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?

A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.