GOLDSTATION Staking
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- Tracked and verifiable from public sources at this check
- No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
- No accounting methodology published at this check
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- Not metIndependent audit report linked publicly
No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/goldstation-staking - Not met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/goldstation-staking - Not metAccounting methodology published in the dataset
No methodology published at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/goldstation-staking - Met
- Met
- MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/goldstation-staking - Not metAccounting methodology published
Not published at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/goldstation-staking - PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
goldstation.io - MetNo account required to reach the application
Reachable without an account at this check.
goldstation.io
- MetTotal value locked published independently
TVL $1m at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/goldstation-staking - Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- MetListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/goldstation-staking
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/goldstation-staking - Not met
- MetChains and category disclosed
Category Staking Pool, 1 chain(s).
defillama.com/protocol/goldstation-staking - Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Met
A real-world-asset-linked staking product holding roughly $1m, with no audit report retrievable at a public address at this check.
Our assessment
Goldstation holds roughly $1m in a staking product linked to real-world assets. No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check.
Real-world backing moves the risk off-chain
Where a token claims backing by a physical or financial asset, the critical questions are off-chain: who holds the asset, who verifies it exists, what legal claim a token holder has, and what happens in an insolvency. None of those can be answered by reading a contract, and all of them determine whether the backing is real.
Attestation is the minimum standard
For any asset-backed product, an independent, regularly published attestation of the holdings is the baseline evidence. Without it, backing is a claim. This applies whether the asset is gold, treasuries or property, and the absence of published attestation is more consequential than the absence of a smart contract audit.
The evidence gap
No audit report at a public address, thin transparency results, and roughly $1m of value — a combination that gives a prospective user very little to work from.
Who it suits
On published evidence, readers wanting real-world-asset exposure should use the better-documented protocols in our DeFi comparison. Goldstation suits users who have independently verified the backing arrangements.
Frequently asked
Does this score mean GOLDSTATION Staking is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.