Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
F
Dex

Fluid DEX

Best for documented on-chain trading

Total value locked:$287m at this checkChains:5Audits recorded:0Audit report linked:Not foundRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
8.1
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 30%6.0
Cost transparency · 20%9.0
Market quality · 25%10.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Documentation published at a public address
  • Deployed across 5 chains
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 30% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Cost transparency · 20% weight9/10 points · 9.0/10
  • Met
    Documentation published where fees are described

    Documentation reachable for fee review.

    docs.fluid.io/
  • Met
    Application reachable without an account

    No account required to reach the app.

    www.fluid.io/
  • Met
    Independent dataset publishes protocol economics

    TVL and change history published independently.

    defillama.com/protocol/fluid-dex
  • Partial
    Fee model documented publicly

    Documentation available; specific fee tiers not captured at this check.

    docs.fluid.io/
  • Met
    No account required to read protocol documentation

    Open documentation.

    docs.fluid.io/
Market quality · 25% weight10/10 points · 10.0/10
Transparency & track record · 15% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

A decentralised exchange whose liquidity doubles as lending collateral and debt, holding $287m across five chains under a novel capital-efficiency design.

Our assessment

Fluid DEX is architecturally distinct from everything else in this comparison. The same capital acts as trading liquidity and as collateral or debt in a lending market — so a position earns swap fees and lending yield simultaneously, from one deposit.

Smart collateral and smart debt

In a conventional setup, capital supplied to a DEX is idle for lending purposes and vice versa. Fluid makes a lending position's collateral available as trading liquidity, and lets debt be denominated in a pair that trades. The capital efficiency is genuine and it is the reason the design attracts attention.

Combining two risk surfaces

Efficiency of this kind comes from combining exposures rather than eliminating them. A position now carries AMM divergence risk and lending liquidation risk in the same contract, and the interactions between them are harder to reason about than either alone. Anyone using it should be comfortable with both mechanisms separately before combining them.

No linked audit report at this check

We found no audit report linked at a public address, which is a significant gap for a novel design. Established AMMs benefit from years of adversarial attention on well-understood code; a new architecture has neither that history nor, here, a published review. Our counterparty pillar weights this at 30% for exactly this reason.

Who it suits

Fluid fits experienced DeFi users who understand both AMM and lending mechanics and want the capital efficiency of combining them. Users who want proven, audited contracts should choose Uniswap, Curve or PancakeSwap.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
Uniswap V39.8audited, multi-chain deploymentRead →
Curve DEX9.6audited, multi-chain deploymentRead →
PancakeSwap AMM9.6audited, multi-chain deploymentRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Fluid DEX is safe to use?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published documentation and independently recorded market data. Contract behaviour is not tested by us.

Where does the TVL figure come from?

An independent public analytics platform, queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public dataset. It records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit was ever performed.