Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
E
Perp Dex

Extended Perps

Best for documented on-chain trading

Total value locked:$123m at this checkChains:2Audits recorded:0Audit report linked:Not foundRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7.6
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 30%6.0
Cost transparency · 20%9.0
Market quality · 25%8.0
Transparency & track record · 15%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Documentation published at a public address
  • Deployed across 2 chains
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 30% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Cost transparency · 20% weight9/10 points · 9.0/10
Market quality · 25% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Transparency & track record · 15% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

A perpetuals venue holding $123m across two chains, built on validity-proof infrastructure for high-throughput order matching.

Our assessment

Extended runs perpetual markets on validity-proof infrastructure designed for high-throughput matching, holding $123m across two chains. The architecture is the reason to consider it and the reason to read carefully.

Why the execution layer matters for perps

Perpetuals need frequent order updates, fast liquidations and low-latency funding calculations. On a chain where each action is a slow, costly transaction, the market either becomes expensive to make or unsafe to liquidate. Building on infrastructure designed for throughput addresses the real constraint rather than working around it.

Validity proofs versus optimistic settlement

A validity-proof system produces cryptographic proof that state transitions were computed correctly, rather than assuming correctness and allowing a challenge window. For a derivatives venue this matters: withdrawal finality without a multi-day challenge period changes how quickly a trader can exit, which is precisely what they want during stress.

Evidence gaps

No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check, and several transparency indicators returned nothing. For a newer venue running novel infrastructure, published review would matter more than for an established protocol whose code has survived years of attack.

Who it suits

Extended fits traders who want fast on-chain perps with proof-based settlement and are comfortable with a newer protocol. Traders prioritising audited evidence should compare GMX, Avantis or Ostium.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
GMX V2 Perps9.3audited, multi-chain deploymentRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Extended Perps is safe to use?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published documentation and independently recorded market data. Contract behaviour is not tested by us.

Where does the TVL figure come from?

An independent public analytics platform, queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public dataset. It records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit was ever performed.