Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
E
Defi Protocols

Ethena USDe

Best for independently tracked protocol

Value locked:$3,916m at this checkChains:1Audits recorded:2Audit report linked:YesRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7.8
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 35%8.0
Cost transparency · 15%7.0
Market quality · 20%8.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • $3,916m recorded independently
Cons
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 35% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Cost transparency · 15% weight7/10 points · 7.0/10
Market quality · 20% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Transparency & track record · 20% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

The protocol operating the delta-neutral hedging behind the USDe synthetic dollar, holding $3.92bn with published audits.

Our assessment

Ethena holds $3.92bn with two audits and reports linked. It operates the hedging that keeps USDe near a dollar: crypto collateral held spot, offset by short perpetual futures positions on centralised venues.

The yield has an identifiable source, which is unusual

Most DeFi yield comes from token emissions that dilute holders. Ethena's comes from perpetual funding — longs paying shorts — plus staking returns on the collateral. That is a real cash flow from an identifiable market, and being able to name where yield comes from puts it ahead of most protocols paying similar rates.

Exchange counterparty risk is the structural exposure

The hedges sit on centralised exchanges, so the backing depends on those venues remaining solvent and honouring positions. Collateral is held with custodians rather than on exchange, which reduces but does not remove the exposure. A major venue failure during a volatile period is the scenario that matters, and it has not happened yet.

Growth has outpaced the test

$3.92bn accumulated quickly during favourable funding conditions. The design's hard test is a prolonged period of negative funding combined with market stress — precisely the conditions under which it would need to unwind hedges at scale. Published audits cover the contracts; they do not cover that scenario.

Who it suits

Ethena fits users who understand the funding-rate mechanism and exchange exposure and want yield-bearing dollar exposure. Users wanting a dollar backed by dollars should hold USDC or USDT.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
Ondo Yield Assets9.3audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Sky Lending9.3audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Ethena USDe is safe?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded data. Contract and custody risk are not tested by us.

Where do these figures come from?

A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Anyone can re-run the query.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public record. It records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.