CryptoSlam
Best for published documentation
How it rates
- Service reachable without an account
- Developer or user documentation published
- No terms found at a conventional public address
- Corporate entity not established from public sources
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- Met
- Met
- Not metTerms published
Not found at this check.
- PartialOperator identifiable from published material
Service published under its own domain; corporate entity not established.
www.cryptoslam.io/ - Not metData provenance disclosed
Not established from public sources at this check.
- Met
- Met
- PartialRates or plans displayed
Page reachable; plan detail not captured at this check.
www.cryptoslam.io/about - Not metTerms describe charges
Not found.
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not metTerms
Not found.
- Met
- Not metData sources disclosed
Not established at this check.
- Met
- Not metTerms published
Not found.
- Met
- Not metCorporate entity identifiable
Not established at this check.
- Not metFunding or ownership disclosed
Not established at this check.
- Met
- Met
- Not metTerms reachable
Not found.
- Met
- Met
An NFT sales data platform that filters wash trading from reported volumes, with documentation published but no retrievable terms.
Our assessment
CryptoSlam tracks NFT sales across chains and — unusually — publishes volumes with wash trading filtered out. Documentation is published; no terms were retrievable at a conventional address.
Filtering wash trades is the most useful thing a data source can do
NFT volume figures are among the least reliable numbers in crypto, because trading with yourself is cheap and rewarded by incentive programmes and trending rankings. A platform that identifies and excludes that activity produces figures that mean something. Most sources do not, and their headline numbers are correspondingly inflated.
Filtering is a judgement, not a measurement
Deciding which trades are wash trades requires heuristics: related wallets, circular flows, implausible price patterns. The methodology can be wrong in both directions, and different providers reach different conclusions on the same data. Published methodology is what lets a reader judge — worth looking for.
The evidence gap
No terms retrievable at a conventional address, and the corporate entity was not established from public sources at this check. For a data source whose value is its methodology, documented methods and terms would both raise the score and make the data more usable.
Who it suits
CryptoSlam fits anyone citing NFT volume figures who wants numbers with manufactured activity removed. Users needing per-item valuation should use NFTBank.
Frequently asked
Does this score assess CryptoSlam's data quality?
No. Data accuracy would require a controlled comparison we do not run. The score covers what is published and reachable before use.
Why is this category smaller than the others?
We check candidates before listing them. Four services we tested for this table no longer respond at all, so the table has fourteen entries rather than fifteen.
Why do all entrants score zero on corporate entity?
Because this class of tool rarely publishes it. The indicator is identical for everyone in the category, so the comparison stays fair.