Trading Tools

CryptoQuant

Best for documentation-led evaluation

Service page:Blocked to automated checksDocumentation:Not found at a conventional addressTerms:Not found at a conventional addressCorporate entity:Not established at this checkRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026

Kayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026

Confidence CRubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026

2.3

out of 10

Open account

Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & operator risk · 25%3.0

Cost transparency · 25%2.0

Product transparency · 25%2.0

Operator transparency · 15%1.0

Public documentation surface · 10%4.0

Pros

Tracked and verifiable from public sources at this check

Cons

Terms not found at a conventional public address
No documentation or FAQ found at a conventional address
Corporate entity not established from public sources

How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & operator risk · 25% weight3/10 points · 3.0/10

Partial
Service reachable at a public address
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
cryptoquant.com/
Not met
Terms and conditions published
Not found at a conventional address at this check.
Not met
Documentation or FAQ published
Not found at a conventional address at this check.
Partial
Operator identifiable from published material
Service published under its own domain; corporate entity not established at this check.
cryptoquant.com/
Partial
No custody of user funds claimed in this assessment
Custody arrangements are not verifiable from the desk and are not scored.
cryptoquant.com/

Cost transparency · 25% weight2/10 points · 2.0/10

Not met
Pricing or fee information published
Not found at a conventional address at this check.
Partial
Information readable without an account
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
cryptoquant.com/
Not met
Rates displayed publicly
Not available at this check.
cryptoquant.com/
Not met
Terms describe charges
Not found at this check.
Partial
Service address published
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
cryptoquant.com/

Product transparency · 25% weight2/10 points · 2.0/10

Partial
Public service page
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
cryptoquant.com/
Not met
Documentation or FAQ
Not found.
Not met
Terms published
Not found.
Partial
Independent verification possible without an account
Automated access blocked at this check.
cryptoquant.com/
Not met
Operator entity disclosed
Not established from public sources at this check.

Operator transparency · 15% weight1/10 points · 1.0/10

Partial
Service resolves to automated verification
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
cryptoquant.com/
Not met
Terms documentation published
Not found.
Not met
Support or FAQ published
Not found.
Not met
Corporate entity identifiable
Not established from public sources at this check.
Not met
Regulatory status published
Not established from public sources at this check.

Public documentation surface · 10% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10

Partial
Service reachable
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
cryptoquant.com/
Not met
Documentation reachable
Not found.
Not met
Terms reachable
Not found.
Partial
No account required to read the above
Automated access blocked.
cryptoquant.com/
Met
Service published under its own domain
Confirmed.
cryptoquant.com/

An on-chain and market data platform focused on exchange reserves, flows and derivatives positioning, with tiers ranging from free to enterprise pricing.

Our assessment

CryptoQuant tracks what moves in and out of exchanges: reserves, netflows, miner behaviour and derivatives positioning. Tiers run from free through Advanced at $29 a month and Professional at $99 to Premium at $799 — the clearest published price ladder in this group.

Exchange flows are the most actionable on-chain data

Coins moving onto an exchange are coins positioned to sell; coins leaving are positioned to hold. That framing is crude and it is directionally informative, and it updates continuously rather than confirming a move weeks later the way slower on-chain metrics do. It is the on-chain data most directly connected to what price does next.

Attribution is the hard part

Every flow metric depends on correctly identifying which addresses belong to which exchange. Venues rotate addresses, use omnibus structures and internal transfers, and a misattributed cluster produces a confidently wrong chart. Large single-day spikes are more often a wallet reorganisation than a market event — check before concluding.

Priced for individuals, unusually

A $29 tier is affordable for an individual trader, which is rare in this category where the alternative starts at $150. Fourteen indicators still found nothing published at conventional addresses and ten returned automated-verification blocks, which is what produces the low documentation score.

Who it suits

CryptoQuant fits active traders who want exchange flow and derivatives positioning at a price an individual can justify. Investors focused on holder cohorts and long-term supply should use Glassnode; those needing wallet identity, Nansen or Arkham.

Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean CryptoQuant is trustworthy?

No. It measures what is published and reachable before use: the service, its terms and its documentation. Custody, routing and corporate structure are not tested by us.

Why do all providers score zero on corporate entity?

Because this class of service rarely publishes it. The indicator is identical for every provider in the category, so the comparison stays fair.

Are rates or spreads compared here?

No. Verifying quoted rates requires live transactions, which we do not perform. The rubric covers disclosure, not execution.