Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
C
Trading Tools

Cryptohopper

Best for documentation-led evaluation

Service page:ReachableDocumentation:PublishedTerms:Not found at a conventional addressCorporate entity:Not established at this checkRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence BRubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
6.1
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & operator risk · 25%6.0
Cost transparency · 25%7.0
Product transparency · 25%6.0
Operator transparency · 15%4.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Service reachable without an account
  • Documentation or FAQ published
Cons
  • Terms not found at a conventional public address
  • Corporate entity not established from public sources
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & operator risk · 25% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
  • Met
    Service reachable at a public address

    Reachable without an account at this check.

    www.cryptohopper.com/
  • Not met
    Terms and conditions published

    Not found at a conventional address at this check.

  • Met
    Documentation or FAQ published

    Reachable at this check.

    www.cryptohopper.com/pricing
  • Partial
    Operator identifiable from published material

    Service published under its own domain; corporate entity not established at this check.

    www.cryptohopper.com/
  • Partial
    No custody of user funds claimed in this assessment

    Custody arrangements are not verifiable from the desk and are not scored.

    www.cryptohopper.com/
Cost transparency · 25% weight7/10 points · 7.0/10
Product transparency · 25% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Operator transparency · 15% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
  • Met
    Service resolves to automated verification

    HTTP 2xx at this check.

    www.cryptohopper.com/
  • Not met
    Terms documentation published

    Not found.

  • Met
    Support or FAQ published

    Reachable.

    www.cryptohopper.com/pricing
  • Not met
    Corporate entity identifiable

    Not established from public sources at this check.

  • Not met
    Regulatory status published

    Not established from public sources at this check.

Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

A cloud-based automated trading platform with a marketplace of third-party strategies and signals, connecting to exchange accounts through API keys.

Our assessment

Cryptohopper runs bots in the cloud rather than on your machine, with a marketplace where third parties sell strategies, signals and templates. The platform question and the marketplace question are separate, and the second is where most users lose money.

A marketplace of strategies is a marketplace of claims

Anyone can publish a strategy with an attractive backtest. Backtests are trivially overfitted, past performance on a trending market says nothing about a ranging one, and the seller earns a subscription whether or not you profit. Treat every published return figure as marketing until you have run it forward on a small allocation.

The API key exposure

Cloud bots require exchange API keys held by the operator, which is the same structural exposure that produced large losses elsewhere in this category. Withhold withdrawal permission, use a subaccount, restrict by IP where possible. A cloud bot cannot run without the key, so the mitigation is limiting what the key can do.

Cost is more than the subscription

Subscription tiers are the visible cost. The real cost is trading fees on a strategy that may trade many times a day, plus slippage, plus any marketplace subscription. A bot that trades frequently can lose to fees while showing a positive gross return, and that arithmetic should be done before deployment rather than after.

Who it suits

Cryptohopper fits traders who want cloud-hosted automation and will evaluate marketplace strategies sceptically on a small allocation first. Traders unwilling to hand API keys to a hosted service should look at self-hosted alternatives.

Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Cryptohopper is trustworthy?

No. It measures what is published and reachable before use: the service, its terms and its documentation. Custody, routing and corporate structure are not tested by us.

Why do all providers score zero on corporate entity?

Because this class of service rarely publishes it. The indicator is identical for every provider in the category, so the comparison stays fair.

Are rates or spreads compared here?

No. Verifying quoted rates requires live transactions, which we do not perform. The rubric covers disclosure, not execution.