Coinigy
Best for documentation-led evaluation
How it rates
- Service reachable without an account
- Documentation or FAQ published
- Terms not found at a conventional public address
- Corporate entity not established from public sources
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- Met
- Not metTerms and conditions published
Not found at a conventional address at this check.
- Met
- PartialOperator identifiable from published material
Service published under its own domain; corporate entity not established at this check.
coinigy.com/ - PartialNo custody of user funds claimed in this assessment
Custody arrangements are not verifiable from the desk and are not scored.
coinigy.com/
- Met
- Met
- PartialRates displayed publicly
Page reachable; specific rates not captured at this check.
coinigy.com/pricing - Not metTerms describe charges
Not found at this check.
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not metTerms published
Not found.
- Met
- Not metOperator entity disclosed
Not established from public sources at this check.
- Met
- Not metTerms documentation published
Not found.
- Met
- Not metCorporate entity identifiable
Not established from public sources at this check.
- Not metRegulatory status published
Not established from public sources at this check.
- Met
- Met
- Not metTerms reachable
Not found.
- Met
- Met
A long-running multi-exchange trading terminal consolidating charting, order entry and portfolio tracking across many connected venues.
Our assessment
Coinigy is a trading terminal rather than a bot platform: it consolidates charting, order entry and portfolio tracking across many exchanges into one interface. It has been running since the early days of crypto trading, which in this category is unusual.
Consolidation without automation
You still make every decision; the platform removes the tab-switching. That is a lower-risk proposition than handing a bot discretion over your balance, and it is a real productivity gain for anyone trading across more than two venues. The API keys involved carry the same handling rules, but nothing trades without your instruction.
Why terminals lost ground
Exchange interfaces improved enormously, and TradingView became the default charting layer with direct broker integrations. A third-party terminal now has to justify itself against tools that are free and better integrated, which is a harder argument in 2026 than it was in 2017.
Where the score is lost
Eight indicators found nothing published at conventional addresses, mostly in cost documentation and terms. For a subscription product, publishing the price list and the terms where a prospective user can read them is a low bar, and the category as a whole clears it poorly.
Who it suits
Coinigy fits active traders spread across several exchanges who want one order-entry and portfolio surface and do not want automation. Traders who mainly need charting will get more from TradingView.
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Coinigy is trustworthy?
No. It measures what is published and reachable before use: the service, its terms and its documentation. Custody, routing and corporate structure are not tested by us.
Why do all providers score zero on corporate entity?
Because this class of service rarely publishes it. The indicator is identical for every provider in the category, so the comparison stays fair.
Are rates or spreads compared here?
No. Verifying quoted rates requires live transactions, which we do not perform. The rubric covers disclosure, not execution.