Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
B
Liquid Staking

Binance Staked SOL

Best for independently tracked protocol

Total value locked:$778m at this checkChains:1Audits recorded:2Audit report linked:YesRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
7.5
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 35%8.0
Cost transparency · 20%7.0
Market quality · 15%6.0
Transparency & track record · 20%8.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Audit report linked from a public dataset
  • TVL of $778m recorded independently
Cons
  • No accounting methodology published at this check
  • Single-chain deployment
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 35% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Cost transparency · 20% weight7/10 points · 7.0/10
Market quality · 15% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Transparency & track record · 20% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

An exchange-operated Solana liquid staking product holding $778m, with published audits and exchange custody of the underlying stake.

Our assessment

Binance Staked SOL holds $778m with two audits and reports linked. As with its Ethereum equivalent, the product works well and the risk lives with the exchange rather than in the contracts.

What you are trusting

The exchange holds the SOL, selects and runs the validators, and issues the derivative. If it becomes insolvent, is subject to enforcement action, or suspends withdrawals, the derivative's redeemability is affected regardless of how the underlying validators perform. That is the counterparty question, and it is not one an audit answers.

Validator selection is invisible

With a protocol, the operator set and its performance are on-chain and inspectable. With an exchange product, validator choice is an internal decision. Solana staking returns vary materially by validator performance and commission, so this is a real information gap rather than a formality.

Where it sits in the table

Published audits and substantial size place it mid-table. It scores below the leading protocols because the transparency indicators that matter here — operator disclosure, on-chain verifiability of the backing — are answered by an exchange's word rather than by a contract.

Who it suits

Binance Staked SOL fits users already holding SOL on the exchange who value convenience over verifiability. Non-custodial alternatives with published audits include Jito on the same chain.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
Lido9.6audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Stader9.5audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
StakeWise V29.4audited protocol with published methodologyRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Binance Staked SOL is safe?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.

Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?

A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.