Bedrock uniETH
Best for audited protocol with published methodology
How it rates
- Audit report linked from a public dataset
- Accounting methodology published
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetIndependent audit report linked publicly
Audit report linked from the public protocol dataset.
github.com/RockX-SG/stake/blob/main/PeckShield-Audit-Report-RockXStaking - Met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/bedrock-unieth - MetAccounting methodology published in the dataset
Methodology published.
defillama.com/protocol/bedrock-unieth - MetApplication reachable at a public address
Reachable without an account at this check.
bedrock.rockx.com/unieth
- MetApplication reachable without an account
Reachable without an account at this check.
bedrock.rockx.com/unieth - MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/bedrock-unieth - Met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
bedrock.rockx.com/unieth - MetNo account required to reach the application
Reachable without an account at this check.
bedrock.rockx.com/unieth
- MetTotal value locked published independently
TVL $20m at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/bedrock-unieth - Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- MetListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/bedrock-unieth
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/bedrock-unieth - MetAudit documentation linked
Linked publicly.
github.com/RockX-SG/stake/blob/main/PeckShield-Audit-Report-RockXStaking - MetChains and category disclosed
Category Liquid Restaking, 1 chain(s).
defillama.com/protocol/bedrock-unieth - Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- MetAudit links reachable
Linked publicly.
github.com/RockX-SG/stake/blob/main/PeckShield-Audit-Report-RockXStaking - Met
- Met
A restaking protocol holding $20m with published audits, offering products across several assets rather than ETH alone.
Our assessment
Bedrock holds $20m with two audits and reports linked, and is unusual in the category for offering restaking across several assets rather than only ETH — including Bitcoin-denominated products.
Restaking beyond Ethereum
Bitcoin has no native staking, so any Bitcoin restaking product must construct the mechanism: wrapping, bridging, or a separate consensus arrangement that pays for security. Each of those adds a component that can fail independently. The yield looks like staking yield and the risk profile is materially different.
Multi-asset means multi-mechanism
Supporting several assets means maintaining several distinct security models, each with its own custody, bridging and slashing arrangements. Users should evaluate the specific product they are entering rather than the protocol as a whole — the ETH product and the Bitcoin product are not the same risk.
Evidence position
Two audits with linked reports is a strong indicator for a protocol at this size, and better than several much larger competitors in this table provide. At $20m, secondary liquidity for the derivative is thin, so plan on redemption rather than sale.
Who it suits
Bedrock fits users who want restaking exposure beyond ETH and will read the mechanism for the specific asset. Users wanting the deepest, best-documented ETH restaking should use Kelp.
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Bedrock uniETH is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.