Argent
Best for open-source verification
How it rates
- Source published in a public repository
- No dedicated security page identified at this check
- Terms not found at the conventional address at this check
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- MetSource code published in a public repository
Repository reachable at this check.
github.com/argentlabs - PartialSecurity documentation or disclosure page published
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
support.argent.xyz/ - PartialUser documentation reachable without an account
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
support.argent.xyz/ - MetPublisher identifiable from its own repository organisation
Repository published under Argent Labs.
github.com/argentlabs - Met
- Met
- Not metTerms or legal documentation public
Not found at the conventional address at this check.
- PartialDocumentation states how the product is funded or priced
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
support.argent.xyz/ - Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- PartialDocumentation site published
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
support.argent.xyz/ - Not metSecurity posture stated publicly
No dedicated security page identified at this check.
- Met
- Met
- Not metSecurity or disclosure page published
Not identified at this check.
- Not metTerms or legal documentation published
Not found at the conventional address at this check.
- PartialSupport or help resource published
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
support.argent.xyz/
- Met
- PartialDocumentation reachable
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
support.argent.xyz/ - Met
- Not metSecurity page reachable
Not identified.
- Not metLegal documentation reachable
Not found at the conventional address.
A smart-contract wallet replacing the seed phrase with guardian-based social recovery, built around Starknet's native account abstraction.
Our assessment
Argent removes the seed phrase entirely. Accounts are smart contracts, and recovery works through guardians — a set of addresses, devices or people that can collectively authorise a new signer. It ships as Argent X for Starknet and Argent Mobile for Ethereum and several Layer 2s.
Social recovery instead of twelve words
A written seed phrase is a single object that both loses your money if destroyed and loses it if found. Guardian recovery replaces that with a quorum: no individual guardian can take your funds, and losing your device is survivable. Argent passed 500,000 registered users on this model, which makes it the largest real-world test of consumer social recovery.
Account abstraction, used properly
Because every Starknet account is a contract by default, Argent can enforce daily transfer limits, guardian approval and email or phone signup at the contract level rather than in an app that could be bypassed. These are the security properties a bank offers, implemented without a bank.
The trade-offs to understand
Smart-contract accounts cost more to deploy and operate than plain key pairs, they are chain-specific rather than portable, and their safety depends on contract code rather than on cryptography alone. Choosing guardians badly — all on one device, or all from one person — recreates the single point of failure the design removed.
Who it suits
Argent fits Starknet and Layer 2 users who want recoverable accounts and are willing to think about guardians once. Users who need broad multi-chain coverage or maximum dapp compatibility should choose MetaMask, Rabby or Trust Wallet.
How rivals compare
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Argent is safe?
No. It measures what a user can verify before installing: published source, documented security posture, open documentation and an identifiable publisher. Runtime key handling is not tested by us.
Why does open source matter for a wallet?
It is the one substantive property an outsider can check without reverse-engineering the app. Everything else requires trusting the publisher or a third-party audit.
What would raise this score?
Publishing source, a dedicated security page, open documentation and terms at stable public addresses — all checkable by anyone.