Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
A
Perp Dex

Apex Omni

Best for documented on-chain trading

Total value locked:$29m at this checkChains:5Audits recorded:0Audit report linked:Not foundRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence ARubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
5.5
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & contract risk · 30%4.0
Cost transparency · 20%4.0
Market quality · 25%8.0
Transparency & track record · 15%6.0
Public documentation surface · 10%6.0
Pros
  • Deployed across 5 chains
Cons
  • No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
  • No documentation site found at a conventional address
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & contract risk · 30% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
Cost transparency · 20% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
Market quality · 25% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10
Transparency & track record · 15% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
Public documentation surface · 10% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10

A perpetuals protocol deployed across five chains holding $29m, with a published evidence base thinner than its deployment breadth.

Our assessment

ApeX Omni is deployed across five chains — wider than most venues here — while holding $29m in total. That combination is the thing to understand: breadth of deployment and depth of liquidity are different properties, and only one of them affects your fill.

Multi-chain deployment splits liquidity

Being on five chains sounds like an advantage and often is not. The same capital divided across five deployments produces five thin markets rather than one deep one, unless liquidity is genuinely shared across them. For a trader, the number that matters is the depth on the chain you are actually trading, not the total.

What is missing from the record

No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check, and several transparency indicators returned nothing. For a protocol running the same contracts across five environments, a single published review would cover a lot of ground — its absence is more consequential here than for a single-chain deployment.

Reading a 5.5

This is a middling score built from real but modest liquidity, wide deployment, and little published evidence. It is not a warning; it is a statement that a prospective user has limited material to work from and should size accordingly.

Who it suits

ApeX Omni fits traders who want perps on a specific chain it serves and have checked the depth on that chain. Traders comparing on published evidence should look at GMX, Avantis, Ostium, GMTrade or Pacifica.

Alternatives

How rivals compare

ServiceScoreBest for
GMX V2 Perps9.3audited, multi-chain deploymentRead →
Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean Apex Omni is safe to use?

No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published documentation and independently recorded market data. Contract behaviour is not tested by us.

Where does the TVL figure come from?

An independent public analytics platform, queried at the verification date. Anyone can re-run the same query.

Why do some protocols score zero on audits?

Because no audit report is linked in the public dataset. It records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit was ever performed.