Adrastea Validator
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- Accounting methodology published
- No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- Not metIndependent audit report linked publicly
No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/adrastea-validator - Not met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/adrastea-validator - MetAccounting methodology published in the dataset
Methodology published.
defillama.com/protocol/adrastea-validator - PartialApplication reachable at a public address
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
adrastea.fi/
- PartialApplication reachable without an account
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
adrastea.fi/ - MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/adrastea-validator - Met
- Not met
- PartialNo account required to reach the application
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
adrastea.fi/
- MetTotal value locked published independently
TVL $20m at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/adrastea-validator - Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- PartialListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/adrastea-validator
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/adrastea-validator - Not met
- MetChains and category disclosed
Category Staking Pool, 1 chain(s).
defillama.com/protocol/adrastea-validator - Met
- Met
- PartialApplication reachable
Published at a documented URL; automated retrieval blocked at this check.
adrastea.fi/ - Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
A validator-linked staking product holding $20m, with no audit report retrievable at a public address at this check.
Our assessment
Adrastea holds $20m in a validator-linked staking product. No audit report was retrievable at a public address at this check, and the transparency indicators returned little.
Validator products are not all the same thing
Delegating directly to a validator is one arrangement; depositing into a contract that delegates on your behalf is another. The first leaves you in control of your stake account; the second introduces contract risk between you and the network. Establishing which applies before depositing is the single most useful thing a prospective user can do.
Yield differences usually have a reason
Where a staking product offers more than the network's base rate, the excess comes from somewhere — MEV capture, fee rebates, token incentives, or additional risk taken with the stake. Each has a different persistence and a different downside. A yield figure without an explanation of its source is not information.
The evidence gap
No audit report at a public address, with thin documentation results. Contract risk carries 35% of the weight in this category, and there is little published to assess.
Who it suits
Adrastea suits users familiar with the operator who have established the custody arrangement themselves. Users wanting audited staking should look to the documented protocols in this table.
Frequently asked
Does this score mean Adrastea Validator is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.