ABC Pool
Best for independently tracked protocol
How it rates
- Accounting methodology published
- No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check
- Single-chain deployment
Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.
- Not metIndependent audit report linked publicly
No audit report linked in the public dataset at this check.
defillama.com/protocol/abc-pool - Not met
- MetTracked by an independent analytics platform
Listed with published TVL and history.
defillama.com/protocol/abc-pool - MetAccounting methodology published in the dataset
Methodology published.
defillama.com/protocol/abc-pool - Met
- Met
- MetProtocol economics published independently
TVL and change history published.
defillama.com/protocol/abc-pool - Met
- PartialFee or reward model documented publicly
Application reachable for review; specific rates not captured at this check.
confluxpos.cn - MetNo account required to reach the application
Reachable without an account at this check.
confluxpos.cn
- Met
- Not met
- Not met
- Not met
- MetListed on the dataset for over a year
Listing date recorded in the dataset.
defillama.com/protocol/abc-pool
- MetIndependent analytics page published
Public protocol page with history.
defillama.com/protocol/abc-pool - Not met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Met
- Not met
- Met
- Met
A staking pool holding $5m, with no audit report retrievable at a public address at this check.
Our assessment
ABC Pool holds $5m in pooled staking with no audit report retrievable at a public address at this check.
What a staking pool is responsible for
A pool takes deposits, delegates them to validators, collects rewards and distributes them. Each of those steps involves contracts holding user funds, accounting that must be correct, and an exit path that must work when several people use it at once. None of that is visible from an advertised yield.
Small pools have limited resources
Operating a staking pool requires ongoing maintenance: validator monitoring, protocol upgrades, response to network changes. A pool with $5m generates minimal fee revenue to fund that, which raises the question of whether it will be actively maintained over the multi-year horizon a staking position implies.
The evidence gap
No audit report at a public address, with thin transparency results. Contract risk carries 35% of the weight in this category, and there is little published to score against it.
Who it suits
ABC Pool suits users already familiar with the operator who are staking small amounts. Users wanting audited pooled staking should compare Réti or a larger protocol on their chain.
Frequently asked
Does this score mean ABC Pool is safe?
No. It measures what an outsider can verify: linked audits, published methodology and independently recorded market data. Contract risk is not tested by us.
Where do the TVL and audit figures come from?
A public analytics dataset queried at the verification date, plus the audit reports it links. Both are re-runnable by anyone.
Why do some protocols score zero on audits?
Because no audit report is linked in the public record. The indicator records what a user can reach, not a claim that no audit exists.