Skip to content
Crypto Almanac Daily
3
Trading Tools

3Commas

Best for documentation-led evaluation

Service page:ReachableDocumentation:PublishedTerms:Not found at a conventional addressCorporate entity:Not established at this checkRubric:v2.0 · verified 9 Aug 2026
Kayla PetersonKayla PetersonDeFi Research Analyst· Last verified August 9, 2026
Confidence BRubric v2.0Verified August 9, 2026
6.1
out of 10
Open account
Scorecard

How it rates

Counterparty & operator risk · 25%6.0
Cost transparency · 25%7.0
Product transparency · 25%6.0
Operator transparency · 15%4.0
Public documentation surface · 10%8.0
Pros
  • Service reachable without an account
  • Documentation or FAQ published
Cons
  • Terms not found at a conventional public address
  • Corporate entity not established from public sources
How this score was built

Each indicator scores 2, 1 or 0. A pillar is the points earned over the points available; the overall score is the weighted sum. Every source below is public — check any of them yourself.

Counterparty & operator risk · 25% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
  • Met
    Service reachable at a public address

    Reachable without an account at this check.

    3commas.io/
  • Not met
    Terms and conditions published

    Not found at a conventional address at this check.

  • Met
    Documentation or FAQ published

    Reachable at this check.

    3commas.io/pricing
  • Partial
    Operator identifiable from published material

    Service published under its own domain; corporate entity not established at this check.

    3commas.io/
  • Partial
    No custody of user funds claimed in this assessment

    Custody arrangements are not verifiable from the desk and are not scored.

    3commas.io/
Cost transparency · 25% weight7/10 points · 7.0/10
  • Met
    Pricing or fee information published

    Reachable at this check.

    3commas.io/pricing
  • Met
    Information readable without an account

    No account required to reach the site.

    3commas.io/
  • Partial
    Rates displayed publicly

    Page reachable; specific rates not captured at this check.

    3commas.io/pricing
  • Not met
    Terms describe charges

    Not found at this check.

  • Met
    Service address published

    Published.

    3commas.io/
Product transparency · 25% weight6/10 points · 6.0/10
  • Met
    Public service page

    Reachable.

    3commas.io/
  • Met
    Documentation or FAQ

    Reachable.

    3commas.io/pricing
  • Not met
    Terms published

    Not found.

  • Met
    Independent verification possible without an account

    Confirmed at this check.

    3commas.io/
  • Not met
    Operator entity disclosed

    Not established from public sources at this check.

Operator transparency · 15% weight4/10 points · 4.0/10
  • Met
    Service resolves to automated verification

    HTTP 2xx at this check.

    3commas.io/
  • Not met
    Terms documentation published

    Not found.

  • Met
    Support or FAQ published

    Reachable.

    3commas.io/pricing
  • Not met
    Corporate entity identifiable

    Not established from public sources at this check.

  • Not met
    Regulatory status published

    Not established from public sources at this check.

Public documentation surface · 10% weight8/10 points · 8.0/10

An established automated trading platform connecting to exchange accounts by API key, whose 2022 credential leak resulted in multi-million dollar user losses.

Our assessment

3Commas is one of the longest-running automated trading platforms, connecting to exchange accounts through API keys to run grid, DCA and copy-trading strategies. Any assessment has to start with December 2022, when 100,000 customer API keys were posted publicly.

What happened in 2022

Unauthorised transactions were first reported in October 2022. By November, users with significant balances reported roughly $6m lost. In December an anonymous account published sample files containing 100,000 API keys generated on Binance and KuCoin. 3Commas initially denied a security issue and confirmed the breach on 29 December. One verified group of 44 victims reported $14.8m stolen in total.

Why API-key platforms carry this risk structurally

Connecting a bot means handing a third party a credential that can trade your exchange balance. Withdrawal permissions can be withheld, and trading permission alone is enough to drain an account through deliberately bad trades against an attacker's orders. This risk exists for every platform in this group — 3Commas is simply the one where it materialised at scale.

What that means for a user today

If you connect any bot platform: withhold withdrawal permission, restrict the key by IP where the exchange allows it, use a subaccount holding only what the strategy needs, and rotate keys periodically. These steps would have limited the 2022 damage substantially, and almost nobody takes them until after an incident.

Who it suits

3Commas fits traders who want mature bot tooling, have read the incident history, and apply strict key hygiene. Traders unwilling to grant API access to a third party should trade manually or use exchange-native bot features instead.

Reference

Frequently asked

Does this score mean 3Commas is trustworthy?

No. It measures what is published and reachable before use: the service, its terms and its documentation. Custody, routing and corporate structure are not tested by us.

Why do all providers score zero on corporate entity?

Because this class of service rarely publishes it. The indicator is identical for every provider in the category, so the comparison stays fair.

Are rates or spreads compared here?

No. Verifying quoted rates requires live transactions, which we do not perform. The rubric covers disclosure, not execution.